Conservatism and Liberalism:
Metamorphoses of the Consensus



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.05.06
ID of the Article: 3612


For citation:

Rakhshmir P.Yu. Conservatism and Liberalism: Metamorphoses of the Consensus . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No 5. P. 60-79 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.05.06



Abstract

An attempt has been made in the article to explain the now perceptible tendencies toward “individualization” of political life and toward appreciable devaluation of party ideologies, in terms of the development of the relationship between two political trends embodying respectively the conservative and the liberal type of policy. After analyzing the process of the formation and deepening of consensus between these trends, the author demonstrates that the now typically prevailing domination of short-term over long-term interests is to a great extent conditioned by historic success of the consensus, by its having acquired a value character. According to his conclusion, it is exactly the firm value foundation and the conversion of the values shared by the parties, into something that goes without saying and is not seriously disputed by anyone, that brought about the prerequisites for tough fights over interests, and if one observes closely the changed societal structure, if one scrutinizes the conglomeration of interests and of positions, the set of ideas that sound new, one may see through them the visible outlines of familiar, though modernized, ideological-political trends.


Content No 5, 2005

See also:


Kolmogorova D.M.,
Russia’s and Germany’s Experience of Consolidating Regions: Publications on the Subject. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Koval Ye.I., Nazukina M.V.,
From the Monarchist Idea to the Conservative One: F.R.Chвteaubriand and the Development of Russian Political Thought in the First Half of the 19th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Panov P.V.,
Reform of Regional Electoral Systems and the Development of Political Parties in Russia’s Regions (Cross-Regional Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Kiryanov I.K.,
Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Titov K.V.,
“Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991