Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit

Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit


Kiryanov I.K.,

Dr. Sci. (Hist. Sci.), Professor, Department of Interdisciplinary Historical Studies, Perm State National Research University, ikiryanov@yandex.ru


elibrary_id: 250677 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2866-877X | RESEARCHER_ID: AAH-5458-2020


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.05.10

For citation:

Kiryanov I.K. Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 5. P. 118-131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.05.10



Abstract

The article offers interpretation of the political processes that were going on in Russia in early 20th century, as an unsuccessful essay of democratic transit. In the author’s estimation, Russian transit that started in 1904, after successfully passing the liberalization phase was interrupted at the democratization phase. Among factors that were hampering transformation of the country’s political system, the author reckons lack of development of the middle class, feebleness of civil society structures, prevalence of the subject-type political culture and, finally, defeats of the Russian army in the course of World War I. In the meantime, as the main cause of the failure of Russian transit of early 20th century, he points to lack of a pact between the reformers among the highest bureaucracy, on the one hand, and the liberal opposition, on the other, conclusion of which was impeded not only by the limited nature of the “democratic” potential of the former, but also by the position of the latter, which suffered short sight.


Content No. 5, 2005

See also:


Kolmogorova D.M.,
Russia’s and Germany’s Experience of Consolidating Regions: Publications on the Subject. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Vasilenko Yu.V.,
An Essay of Typology of Spanish Conservatism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Koval Ye.I., Nazukina M.V.,
From the Monarchist Idea to the Conservative One: F.R.Chвteaubriand and the Development of Russian Political Thought in the First Half of the 19th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Panov P.V.,
Reform of Regional Electoral Systems and the Development of Political Parties in Russia’s Regions (Cross-Regional Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Titov K.V.,
“Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5


Screen version