“Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature)


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.05.11
ID of the Article: 3617


For citation:

Titov K.V. “Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No 5. P. 132-141 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.05.11



Abstract

The article is aimed at substantiating the thesis that N.S.Khrushchev's report at a closed session of the 20th congress of the CPSU was in fact draft political contract proposed by the claimant upon supreme power to the claimants upon the role of the ruling class. Proceeding from the occurrence frequency analysis of the report's fragments corresponding to the three lines of accusations brought against Stalin (violation of the principle of collective leadership in the party; mass repressive measures; assuming all the merits in so far as the cause of socialist construction and the victory over fascism are concerned), the author demonstrates that so far as the first two positions are concerned, it was first of all the superior nomenclature which figured in the report as the party that had suffered, to which the invitation into the power was exactly addressed and which was given guarantee of inviolability. In the author's estimation, the conclusion of this contract proved to be the first step toward the conversion of the nomenclature into the ruling elite, which event undermined the foundations of the Soviet regime and led it in the long run to its breakup.


Content No 5, 2005

See also:


Podvintzev O.B.,
Psephology as the Science Studying Elections. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Fadeyeva L.A.,
Problems of Developing the Universitarian Political Science in Russia’s Regions in the Context of the Bologna Process. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Neganov S.V.,
The Perm Oblast: Political Picture of a Region and Development of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Sulimov K.A.,
To Paradoxical Character of Modern Political Knowledge. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Kolmogorova D.M.,
Russia’s and Germany’s Experience of Consolidating Regions: Publications on the Subject. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
No 4 2003


Shcherbakov A.Ye.
The Place of Myth in Political Ideology 175

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991