.jpg)
print«New» or «Old» great debates?
Rubric: Feedback
For citation:
Safronova O.V., Korshunov D.S. «New» or «Old» great debates? – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No. 4. P. 182-188. (In Russ.)
Abstract
By this response on the part of our collegues from two universities of Nizhni Novgorod, the Polis journal opens discussion on topical trends in today’s realm of international relations theory (IRT). Strictly speaking, the discussion in question was already actually initiated exactly by V. Konyshev and A. Sergunin in their article in Polis, 2013, No. 2.
Keywords
international relations theory (IRT); “great debates”; V. Konyshev; A. Sergunin.
Content No. 4, 2013
See also:
Alekseyeva T.A.,
The Debates about “Great Debates”: How to Structure the Theory of International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6
Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A.,
“The Great Debates”: The Means of Structuring or Periodization of International Relations Theory?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No4
Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A.,
International relations theory: on the threshold of new «Great Debates»?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2
Pavlova E.B., Romanova T.A.,
Debates in International Relations Theory: Rethinking Interdisciplinarity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No2
Sergeev V.M., Kazantzev A.A., Medvedeva S.M.,
The Crisis of Constructivism and Methodological Problems of Studying International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5
.jpg)
.jpg)