Northern Caucasus in the Russian geopolitical discourse


Kolosov V.A.,

Dr. Sci. (Geogr.), Professor, Deputy Director, Head, Laboratory of Geopolitical Studies, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor-Researcher, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, vladimirkolossov@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 625820 |

Sebentzov A.B.,

Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory of Geopolitical Studies, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, asebentsov@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 618867 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.02.11
ID of the Article: 4834


For citation:

Kolosov V.A., Sebentzov A.B. Northern Caucasus in the Russian geopolitical discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No 2. P. 146-163 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.02.11



Abstract

The task of this work is to determine – with recourse to modified technique of analyzing geopolitical discourse proposed by G. Toal – the Russian geopolitical discourse about North Caucasus and to compare it with the opinions of inhabitants of the region itself. Three kinds of sources have been applied. First, we have considered estimations of the most significant events in the region by the head of the Russian state. Second, publications related to North Caucasus have been studied. Analyzed have been two time periods: from October 2005 to September 2006 and from January to December 2010) of three all-Russian newspapers representing the spectrum of the country’s public opinion: the “Sovetskaya Rosiya”, reflecting positions of the left forces; the “Zavtra” newspaper representing the viewpoint of national patriotic opposition; and the “Novaya gazeta” coming out from liberal positions. And, third, materials of all-Russian and regional public opinion polls have been used. It has been established that the official optimistic position is rather unpopular in the region itself. As distinct from the said position, the oppositional discourse is of an alarmist character. At the same time there are questions arousing consensus of all political forces and of the population, which allows to stand a chance for solution of a number of problems

Keywords
critical geopolitics; geopolitical discourse; North Caucasus; sociological polls; political interests.


Content No 2, 2014

See also:


Borov Kh., Dzamikhov K.F.,
Russia and Northern Caucasus (Modern Political Experience in a Historical Context). – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No3

Analytical Report by the Institute of Sociology, RAS,
Twenty years of reforms as perceived by Russians. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6

Isayev B.A.,
Geopolitics: classical and modern. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Pan Dawei,
Which country is easier to deal with? Identity of the residents of Shanghai and St. Petersburg. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2

Yegorov Yu.N., Mitrokhin S.S., Proskurin S.A., Tikhonov V.A., Tzyurupa A.I., Rogozin D.O., Chernyakhovsky S.F., Shubin A.V.,
National Interests and Political Realia of Contemporary Russia (Yu.N. Yegorov, S.S. Mitrokhin, S.A. Proskurin, V.A. Tikhonov, A.l. Tzyurupa, D.O. Rogozin, S.F. Chernyakhovsky, A.V. Shubin). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No1

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991