.jpg)
printImage of China as an anti-Muslim “Other” in the Indonesian media
Kyrchanoff M.V.,
Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia, maksymkyrchanoff@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 342670 |
Article received: 2022.02.22. Accepted: 2022.11.30
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.01.12
EDN: GRPAIS
Rubric: Orbis terrarum
For citation:
Kyrchanoff M.V. Image of China as an anti-Muslim “Other” in the Indonesian media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 1. P. 163-173. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.12. EDN: GRPAIS
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze, using Indonesian media contents, images of China as an Alien and as a country pursuing a policy that is interpreted in Indonesia as anti-Islamic. The novelty of the study lies in the analysis of modern nationalist political imagination in the discursive space formed by the Indonesian media. The author comes to the conclusion that in this imaginary space negative images of China are formed, which subsequently circulate in it and are purposefully promoted with the aim of constructing the image of China in Indonesia as a universal ideological and political Other. The article shows that 1) the Indonesian nationalist imagination, through the media, actively reproduces negative images of China as a subject of the policy of assimilation of Muslim minorities on the territory of the PRC, 2) in the discourses of Indonesian expert and analytical communities, narratives are promoted about the authoritarian nature of the political regime of the PRC and its policies aimed at politicizing Islam and its subsequent integration into the functioning mechanism of this regime. Such a policy is interpreted in Indonesia as ideologically limiting the activities of Chinese Muslims and putting them under the control of communist ideology, which gives grounds to characterize the PRC as a political and ideological Other. Narratives that highlight the unresolved problems between the China state and Islamic communities play an important role in promoting the image of the PRC as an undemocratic and authoritarian state. The results of the study suggest that the evolution of anti-Chinese narratives and the further promotion in the Indonesian political imagination of the image of China as a universal Other and a state politically and ideologically alien to Islam will strengthen the legitimation of anti-Chinese phobias and stereotypes traditional for Indonesian society at both the political and religious levels.
Keywords
Indonesia, images of China, images of the Other, anti-Chinese phobias, discourses, narratives, political stereotypes, political imagination, Islam, Chinese Muslims, Indonesian Islamic nationalism.
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Billé, Fr. (2015). Sinophobia: anxiety, violence, and the making of Mongolian identity. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Coppel, Ch. (2008). Anti-Chinese violence in Indonesia after Soeharto. In L. Suryadinata (Ed.), Ethnic Chinese in Contemporary Indonesia (pp. 117-136). Singapore: Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Ewertowski, T. (2021). Images of China in Polish and Serbian travel writings (1720-1949). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435445
Herlijanto, J. (2017). Public perceptions of China in Indonesia: the Indonesia national survey. Perspective. Researchers at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_89.pdf
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holsti, O. (1967). Cognitive dynamics and images of the enemy. Journal of International Affairs, 21(1), 16-39.
Holsti, O. (1970). The “operational code” approach to the study of political leaders: John Foster Dulles’ philosophical and instrumental beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 3(1), 123-157.
Jervis, R. (1989). The logic of images in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jervis, R. (2008). Nuclear weapons, explaining the non-realist politics of the Bush administration and US military presence in Europe. Theory Talk, 12. http://www.theory-talks.org/2008/07/theory-talk-12.html
Kaplowitz, N. (1990). National self-images, perception of enemies, and conflict strategies: psychopolitical dimensions of international relations. Political Psychology, 11(1), 39-82.
Karásková, I. (2021). China’s image in the Czech Republic. Media reflection of elite policies. In S. Rowley (Ed.), European Perceptions of China and Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 171-187). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004469846_010
Legge, J.D. (2011). Intellectuals and nationalism in Indonesia. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Onuf, N. (2015). Evolution of social constructivism, turns in IR, and a discipline of our making. Theory Talk, 70. URL.: http://www.theory-talks.org/2015/07/theory-talk-70.html
Ratuva, S. (2021). The politics of imagery: understanding the historical genesis of Sinophobia in Pacific geopolitics. East Asia, 39, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09376-9
Simons, J. (2000). Ideology, imagology, and critical thought: the impoverishment of politics. Journal of Political Ideologies, 5(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/135693100112936
Thung, Ju Lan. (2017). Chinese Indonesians and China-Indonesia relations: a juxtaposition of identity and politics. Masyarakat Indonesia, 43(2), 197-206.
Vlaeminck, E. (2021). China’s image in Belgian media. Between fascination and fear. In S. Rowley (Ed.), European Perceptions of China and Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 188-204). Leiden: Brill.
Weizman, E. (2015). Architectural-Image complex, forensic archeology and policing across the desertification line. Theory Talk, 69. http://www.theory-talks.org/2015/03/theory-talk-69.html
Witchard, A. (2014). England’s yellow peril: Sinophobia and the Great War. London: Penguin.
Zheng, T. (2013). ‘East or West, home is best’? An examination of European images of China as the cultural other. In K. Sandrock, & O. Wright (Ed.), Locating Italy. East and West in British–Italian Transactions (pp. 59-92). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209052_005
Chernobrov, D.V. (2012). Evolution of the other in modern conflict: a constructivist experience of conflict. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 6, 47-53.
Karabulatova, I.S., & Lagutkina, M.D. (2021). The image of China in the linguistic-informational model of modern media discourse (based on Russian and Chinese mass media). Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 21(4), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V124
Kirchanoff, M.V. (2009). Natsionalizm i modernizatsiya v Indonezii v XX veke [Nationalism and modernization in Indonesia in the 20th century]. Voronezh: Nauchnaya kniga.
Kirchanoff, M.V. (2013). “Plachushchie po neskonchaemomu miru”: kolonializm, natsionalizm i transkul’turalizm. Problemy postkolonial’nogo analiza. Voronezh: Nauchnaya kniga.
Kirchanoff, M.V. (2022). Perception of communism in сontemporary Indonesian politics of memory: between “the return” and “the oblivion”. Oriental Courier, 2, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.18254/S268684310021597-4
Severskaya, O., & Saakyan, L. (2020). Figure, image, reputation of politicians in the language and the actual political discourse (a corpus research experience). Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, XI(2), 357-371.
Scherbinina, N.G. (2013). The visual image and optical political regime. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 3, 67-69.
Valitov, A.A. & Gerasimova, V.A. (2020). Image of the Jews in the records of Siberian pilgrims as a factor for determining Russian identity. Tomsk State University Journal of History, 64, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/64/21
Voronina, N.I. (2011). Ethos “we” and self-identification problems. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 2, 5-11.
Content No. 1, 2024
See also:
Krestinina Ye.S.,
Image of «the Other» in the structure of modern identity of russian society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4
Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D.,
The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Rakitiansky N.M., Smulkina N.V., Palitay I.S., Zatonskikh A.V., Evgenyeva T.V., Selezneva A.V., Cherdantzeva A.M., Nikiforov A.R., Bogdan I.V., Ahmatnurova S.F., Samarkina I.V., Bukreyeva O.V., Shestopal Ye.B., Shcherbinin A.I., Shcherbinina N.G., Yanitzky M.S., Titov V.V.,
Political behavior: unconscious mechanisms and their rationalization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No6
Lukin A.V.,
The Image of China in Russian Social Consciousness: Continuity and Evolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Radina N.K.,
“Imagined Geopolitics” in the Russian Media Discourse on Coronavirus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No1
.jpg)
.jpg)
