print

Foreign interference as a form of interstate competition:
types and motives

Suchkov M.A.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, suchkov.m@my.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 770218 | ORCID: 0000-0003-3551-7256 |

Article received: 2023.11.11. Accepted: 2024.03.10


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.03.02
EDN: ZLHUCK

Rubric: Theme of the issue: New faces of global politics

For citation:

Suchkov M.A. Foreign interference as a form of interstate competition: types and motives . – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 3. P. 8-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.02. EDN: ZLHUCK

The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant № 22-18-00723, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00723/.

Abstract

The revival of the “great power competition” as a modern-day paradigm of international relations boosts certain forms of interstate rivalry that can be simultaneously effective and correspond to certain levels of acceptable cost-benefit balance. This includes the phenomenon of foreign interference into the domestic affairs of sovereign states. Research on this topic by foreign and Russian authors can be divided into two closely intertwined, but problematically different blocks: the former make attempts to theoretically understand the very concept of “interference”, while the latter focuses primarily on the phenomenon of “interference” as an element of strategic competition. While the former is primarily focused on clarifying the “contents” of the interference, the latter, in essence, is devoted to understanding its “form” with an emphasis on the actions of states. This paper seeks to determine the place of “interference” within the overall framework of interstate rivalry, to clarify the content and the definition of the very concept. It seeks to identify the motives for interference, construct their hierarchy, pair them with types of actions, and on this basis present a “ladder of escalation of interference” similar to the “ladders of escalation” of other types of military-political conflicts. The construction of such a model intends to help organize analysis and improve predictive capabilities on the issue of interference into domestic affairs and facilitate the adoption of more effective decisions in this area by policy-making circles.

Keywords

interference, strategic competition, war, hybrid warfare, color revolutions, escalation, de¬escalation, ladder of escalation.

Barss, E. (2022). Chinese election interference in Taiwan. Routledge.

Carlson, L. (1995). A theory of escalation and international conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(3), 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002795039003006

Chekov, A.D., Makarycheva, A.V., Solomentseva, A.M., Suchkov, M.A., & Sushentsov, A.A. (2019).

War of the future: a view from Russia. Survival, 61(6), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1688563 Davis, P., & Stan, P. (1984). Concepts and models of escalation. A Report from the RAND Strategy Assessment Center. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2007/R3235.pdf

Finlay, L., & Payne, C. (2019). The attribution problem and cyber armed attacks. AJIL Unbound, 113, 202-206. https://doi:10.1017/aju.2019.35

Hammond-Errey, M. (2019). Understanding and assessing information influence and foreign interference. Journal of Information Warfare, 18(1), 1-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26894654

Hoffman, F. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: the rise of hybrid wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies

Istomin, I.A. (2023). Military deterrence vs foreign interference? Record of the Cold War. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 16(1), 106-129. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-olf4

Kahn, H. (2010). On escalation: metaphors and scenarios (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315125565

Knake, R. (2020). Banning covert foreign election interference. Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep29914

Kratochwil, F. (1995). Sovereignty as dominium: is there a right of humanitarian intervention? In State Sovereignty and International Intervention (p. 21-42). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Kriesberg, L. (2015). Escalations and de-escalations in the Cold War, 1945-1968. In Realizing Peace: A Constructive Conflict Approach (pp. 22-56). New York, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190228668.003.0002

Little, R. (1975). Intervention: external involvement in civil wars. London: M. Robertson.

Morgan, F., Mueller, K., Medeiros, E., Pollpeter, K., & Cliff, R. (2008). The nature of escalation. In Dangerous Thresholds: Managing Escalation in the 21st Century (1st ed) (pp. 7-46). RAND Corporation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg614af.9

Rahman, M., Haciyakupoglu, G., Ang B., Leong D., Yang J., & Yi-Ling, T. (2020). Cases of foreign interference in Asia. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24327

Rich, P. (2019). The snowball phenomenon: the US marine corps, military mythology and the spread of hybrid warfare theory. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(4), 430-446. https://doi:10.1080/14751798.2019.1675942

Standish, R. (2018). Inside a European Center to combat Russia's hybrid warfare. Foreign Policy. https:// foreignpolicy.com/2018/01/18/inside-a-european-center-to-combat-russias-hybrid-warfare/

Strickland, D. (2020). Overriding democracy: American intervention in Yeltsin's 1996 reelection campaign. Footnotes: A Journal of History, 4, 166-181.

Sweijs, T., Usanov, A., & Rutten, R. (2016). Crisis and escalation. In Back to the Brink: Escalation and Interstate (pp. 35-53). Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.

Wohlforth, W. (2020). Realism and great power subversion. International Relations, 34(4), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820968858

Bartenev, V.I. (2018). Intervention in the domestic affairs: questioning definitions. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, 10(4), 79-108. (In Russ.)

Istomin, I.A. (2023). Foreign interference in internal affairs: deconstruction of an essentially indeterminate concept. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 120-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.09

Kokoshin, A.A. Baluevskiy, Y.N, Esin V.I., & Shlaykhturov A.V. (2021). Voprosi eskalatsii i deeskalatsii

krizisnikh situatsyi, vooruzhennikh konfliktov i voyin [Escalation and de-escalation in crisis situations, armed conflicts and wars]. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)

Kokoshin, A.A. (2006). Real'nyi suverenitet v sovremennoi miropoliticheskoi sisteme [Real sovereignty in the modern world political system]. Moscow: Evropa. (In Russ.)

Marchenkov, V.I. (Ed.). (2005). Khochesh' mira, pobedi myatezhevoinu! Tvorcheskoe nasledie E. Messnera [If you seek peace, find a way to win the subversion-war]. Moscow: Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)

Shmeleva, E.Ya. (2020). The history of the word interventsiya in Russian. Russkaya rech', 5, 99-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170012135-7

Suchkov, M.A. (2020). Problema uregulirovaniya v Sirii v otnosheniyakh Rossii i SShA [The problem of Syrian settlement in relations between Russia and the United States]. Rossiya i SShA v XXI veke. Osobennosti otnoshenii [Russia and the USA in the XXI century. Features of relationships] (pp. 183-198). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

See also: