Methodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (III)
Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich,
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Moscow, Russia
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.03.15
Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich Methodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (III) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.03.15
The third part of A.A.Degtyaryov’s article completes the cycle of publications on theory of political decision making (PDM). (For the first two parts of the article, see: Polis, 2003, № 1, 2). In this concluding fragment, the author discloses the content of the organizational-institutional approach, as well as of the models of the political government cycle. The scholar carries out comparative analysis of the PDM models and comes to the conclusion that in the whole of political science it has not, even up to now, turned out possible to create a theory that would be able to embrace, i.e. to reflect in a complex way, all the main systems of societally significant decision making. As the grand total of all the three parts of the article, its concluding part contains a compound table designed to demonstrate the diversity of all the methodological approaches that have been dwelled upon in the article, of their disciplinary sources, of political agents’ functions and dominating motivations.
See also:
Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2
Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4
Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4
Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4