Unauthoritative Laws (To the Psychology of Russian Executive Power) (Foreword by I.L. Belenky)

Unauthoritative Laws (To the Psychology of Russian Executive Power) (Foreword by I.L. Belenky)




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.01.09
Rubric: Thesaurus

For citation:

Brinkman von A. Unauthoritative Laws (To the Psychology of Russian Executive Power) (Foreword by I.L. Belenky) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.01.09



Abstract

The article by A. von Brinkman, a Russian jurist of the beginning of the 20th century, which originally appeared in the “Russkaya mysl” journal in 1907 (its republication is now presented for the readers of this issue of the Polis), contains the formulation of an original vision of the course of our country’s history – vision unordinary for the Russian historical science. The thesis of contrariety of the state power and the “soil” (“the people”), shared to this or that extent by many historiography schools, was amplified by the author, receiving additional complexity and being reinterpreted in consequence of the introduction into the coordinate system, of distinction between supreme power proper and executive (“administering”) one and, what is especially important, of ideas of political contradictions between certain particular strata of the power and society. In the article by A. von Brinkman, all this is conceptually, but, at that, metaphorically described through opposing the “oprichnina” and the “zemshchina”, the dialectics of whose relations exactly gave rise to such a significant phenomenon of New Time Russian history, as “unauthoritative laws”.


Content No. 1, 2006

See also:


Weber M.,
Russia's Transition to Pseudoconstitutionalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No2

Massing O.,
Domination. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No6

Aron R.,
An Essay on Liberties: A Universal and Unique Formula of Liberty Does Not Exist. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No1

Salmin A.M.,
The Church, the State and Politics in the Catholic World. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No6

Modelski G.,
The Evolution of Global Politics (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
4 2006


Fishman L.G.
Political Myth and Ideology: Dangerous Rapprochement?

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991