Concepts, Assumptions and Hypotheses about Democratization (Reflections on Applicability of the Transitological Paradigm for the Study of Post-Communist Transformations)


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.04.02
ID of the Article:


For citation:

Karl T.L., Schmitter Ph. Concepts, Assumptions and Hypotheses about Democratization (Reflections on Applicability of the Transitological Paradigm for the Study of Post-Communist Transformations) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No 4. P. 6-27 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.04.02



Abstract

The journal offers the translation of the paper which was presented by well-known American political scientists T.L.Karl and Ph.Schmitter at the Workshop on Regime Transformations: Transformations from Communist Rule in Comparative Perspective, Stanford University, November 15-16, 2003. The paper is focused on the issue of applicability of democratization theories derived from the cases of Southern Europe and South America, for the study of post-communist transformations. The authors thoroughly analyze the argumentation of the Eastern Exceptionalists and demonstrate that what underlies the argumentation is distorted understanding of the concepts, assumptions and hypotheses contained in what has come to be called “transitology” and “consolidology”. According to Karl and Schmitter, the fact that some post-communist countries have failed to democratize, testifies not so much to inadequacy of the transition/consolidation paradigm, as to the need for clarifying definitions and measurements of democracy so that we can be certain we are using the same concepts and metrics to identify similar events and processes. While admitting that the post-communist countries may have the characteristics of a specific case, the authors at the same time argue that the said countries’ features of similarity with other ones where democratization has recently occurred, are compelling enough to derive concepts, assumptions and hypotheses, test them and confirm or falsify them using all the relevant experiences of every region of the world.


Content No 4, 2004

See also:


Pshizova S.N.,
Financing Political Market: Theoretical Aspects of Practical Problems (1). – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No1

Discussion.,
Rethinking Modernity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No2

Vasilchuk Yu.A.,
The Era of Scientific and Technological Revolution: New Foundations of Mass Production and Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No2

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Krasin Yu.A., Galkin A.A., Shestopal A.V., Tolstykh V.I., Fyodorova M.M., Pantin I.K., Veber A.B., Gabitova R.M., Peregudov S.P., Portyakov V.Ya., Stepanova N.M., Barabanov O.N.,
Conservatism as a Trend in Social Thought and a Factor of Social Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No4

Galkin A.A.,
Globalization and Political Shocks of the 21st Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
No 4 2009


Zheleznyakov A.S.
Subjects of Modern World Arrangement: the Nomadic Mongolia

 The article text
 

Archive

   2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991