Who Should Rule: People or Laws? Masses or Personalities? (Apologia of Existential Autocracy)

Who Should Rule: People or Laws? Masses or Personalities? (Apologia of Existential Autocracy)




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.02.15
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Fatenkov A.N. Who Should Rule: People or Laws? Masses or Personalities? (Apologia of Existential Autocracy) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 2. P. 158-171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.02.15



Abstract

It is the opposition of personalism and institutionalism that is, within the channel of Russian politico-philosophical tradition, under consideration in the present article. On subjecting to sharp criticism the ideologemes of liberalism and democracy as methodologically untenable and defective, the author opposes to them the idea of existential autocracy. According to his conclusion, only the power of an elite capable of sacrificing itself for the good of the people, for the sake of safeguarding, ennobling and saving the people without demanding a similar exploit from the patronized fellow-citizens, is absolutely legitimate. Only given the condition that such humans brought into being by the forming and developing people, come to power, he argues, can the power be regarded as truly just.


Content No. 2, 2005

See also:


Zamyatin D.N.,
Space and (In)security: ontological models of imagination. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3

Shaptalov B.N.,
Russia’s Choice in the Light of “Classic Democracy”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Yanov A.L.,
Slavophiles and Foreign Politics of Russia in the 19th Century.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Melville A.Yu.,
So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4


Screen version