.jpg)
printPolitical Behavior in Modern Russia in the Light of the Ressentiment Concept
Kozlov D.V.,
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Associate Professor, Center for Advanced Studies and Education, Irkutsk State University, dvk@home.isu.ru
elibrary_id: 211615 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.01.08
Rubric: Russia Today
For citation:
Kozlov D.V. Political Behavior in Modern Russia in the Light of the Ressentiment Concept. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 1. P. 85-98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.01.08
Abstract
The article analyzes the phenomenon of mass political response to the Ukrainian crisis and the decline of Russian-American and Russian-European relations, as well as promotion of these events in the media in 2013‑2015. For many researchers it was the case to describe different patterns of mass behavior as one of conditions for the modern political process. The article discusses the concept of anomie and ressentiment, which allows to give a new interpretation of the crisis of modern Russian society and to describe this situation as a complex phenomenon that is associated with the previous historical development by path dependence logic. The article also examines the possibility of interpreting the crisis, taking into account its development in the framework of the consumerist society. As a result, we can conclude that the recent significant changes in Russian mass politics partly associated with the development of the politics of nostalgia, which in interaction with various practices of ressentiment fit fully into the logic of consumerist society and influence to the production of new important ideological and cultural goods for mass consumption. We can speak about the interesting type of possible political behavior of the individual or social group, which combines variety of values connected with the ideology of ressentiment, the illusion of participation in politics through consumerist consumption of media political product, the need for constant design of involvement`s feelings to the existing political regime by power and media through the implementation of the specific historical policy aimed to work with images of the past and their active consumption by the modern Russian society. These political orientations hardly fit into the traditional ideological and political schemes of the European society of modernity (liberalism, conservatism, left ideologies, etc.) and make possible a new approach to estimate as the ways of describing of the current political preferences of the Russian society as the dynamics of their possible changes in the future.
Keywords
Russia; ressentiment; trauma; consumerist society; political process; politics of nostalgia; crisis.
References
Alexander J. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. (Russ. ed.: Alexander J. Smysly socialnoy gizni: Kultursociologia. Moscow: Praxis. 2013. 640 p.)
Améry J. Jenseits Von Schuld und Sühne: Bewältigungsversuche eines Überwältigen. (Russ. ed.: Améry J. Po tu storonu prestuplenia i nakazania. Мoscow: Novoe izdatelstvo. 2015. 198 p.)
Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.1996. 224 p.
Dvadtsat’ let reform glazami rossian (opyt mnogoletnih sociologicheskih zamerov) [Twenty Years of Reforms by Eyes of Russians: the Experience of Sociological Many Year Measurements. Analytical Report, Institute of Sociology, RAS]. Moscow: Ves Mir. 2011. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Fitzpatrick Sh. Vengeance and Ressentiment in the Russian Revolution. – French Historical Studies. Vol. 24. No. 4 (Fall). 2001. P. 579‑588.
Gelman V. The Dead End of Authoritarian Modernization. – Pro et Contra. 2009. No. 5/6 (47). P. 51‑61. (In Russ.)
Kara-Murza S.G. Anomia v Rossii: prichiny i proyavlenia [Anomie in Russia: Causes and Manifestation]. Мoscow: Nauchnyi Expert. 2013. 264 p. (In Russ.)
Miller A. The Invention of Tradition. The Georgian Ribbon and other Symbols in the Context of Historical Policy. – Pro et Contra. May – June. 2012. P. 94‑100. (In Russ.)
Nietzsche F. Zur Genealogie der Moral. (Russ. ed.: Nietzsche F. K genealogii morali. – Works. Vol. 2. Мoscow: Mysl. 1990. P. 407‑524).
Sloterdijk P. Kritik der zynischen Vernunft. (Russ. ed.: Sloterdijk P. Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma. Ekaterinburg: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta. 2001. 584 p.)
Surkov V. Texts 97‑07. Statyi i vystuplenia [Articles and Speeches]. Мoscow: Europe. 2008. 192 p. (In Russ.)
Scheler М. Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Morale. (Russ. ed.: Scheler М. Resentiment v structure moraley. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, Universitetskaya Kniga. 1999. 231 p.)
Schtompka P. Social Transformation as Trauma. – Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2001. No.1. P. 6‑16. (In Russ.)
Žižek S. Violence. (Russ. ed.: Žižek S. O nasilii. Мoscow: Europe. 2010. 184 p.)
Content No. 1, 2017
See also:
Zagladin N.V., Kucherenko A.A.,
Global Crisis: Reasons, Consequences and Russia (Returning to What’s Been Read). – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Malakhov V.S., Letnyakov D.E.,
The collapse of hegemonial normality: migration and the politics of memory in the U.S., UK and France. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No1
Sakwa R.,
Axiological vs dialogical politics in contemporary Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2
Neklessa A.I.,
Crisis of the modern world: new forms of sociality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No2
Petukhov V.V.,
The Crisis Reality and Prospects of Political Transformation of the Russian Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5
.jpg)
.jpg)