.jpg)
printTransformation of Images of Power and Political Leaders of Great Britain Under the Influence of Brexit (on Materials of European and American Media, 2014-2017)
Palitay I.S.,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Sociology and Psychology, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 8321532@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 708065 | ORCID: 0000-0001-9932-562X | RESEARCHER_ID: V-5569-2018
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.02.11
Rubric: Orbis Terrarum
For citation:
Palitay I.S. Transformation of Images of Power and Political Leaders of Great Britain Under the Influence of Brexit (on Materials of European and American Media, 2014-2017). – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 2. P. 150-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.02.11
Abstract
The political images formed in the mass consciousness largely determine not only the attitude of citizens to certain political events and objects, but also their political behavior. Due to the fact that modern politics is increasingly becoming virtual, one should not underestimate the impact of mass communication on the formation of these images. It is obvious that the contextual factor, including situational changes occurring in the political arena both inside the country and outside it, is the determining factor in the content of the information that comes from the media and on the basis of which, accordingly, political images are formed in the mass consciousness. The article attempts to analyze the transformation of communicative images of power and political leaders of Great Britain under the influence of Brexit, i.e. during the period from 2014 to 2017. Since the main economic partners of this country are the United States and the European Union countries, the main news channels of these countries served as the source of data for the content analysis: American CNN and FOX News, as well as European Euronews and France24. According to the methodology developed at the Department of Sociology and Psychology of the Politics Department of the Lomonosov Moscow State University, a study was carried out which main goal was to compare the communicative images of power and political leaders of Great Britain in terms of strengths, weaknesses, attractiveness, unattractiveness, activity and passivity before and after Brexit. According to the results of the research, it was found that the image of power, regardless of the country’s media affiliation, undergoes minor changes, which can’t be said about the image of D. Cameron. The data obtained during this kind of research not only gives an idea of the actual image broadcasted by the media, but also allows us to identify both the psychological mechanisms of its formation and the limits of the influence of the media on the stable mental structures of citizens. In practice, such data can allow to determine those actions that the country needs to take to form its image and information strategy.
Keywords
power; political leader; image; perception; image of power; image of leader; Great Britain; Brexit; transformation of the political image; political and psychological research.
References
Brader T., Marcus G.E. Emotion and Political Psychology. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 165-204.
Britishness: Perspectives on the Britishness Question. Ed. by A. Gamble, T. Wright. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 2009. 182 p.
Bruner J.S., Postman L. Perception Cognition and Behavior. – Journal of Personality. 1949. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 14-31.
Caprara G.V., Vecchione M. Personality Approaches to Political Behavior. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 23-58.
Chong D. Degrees of Rationality in Politics. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 96-129.
Crigler A.N. The Psychology of Political Communication. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. 1996. 262 p.
Dilemmy Britanii: poisk putey razvitiya. Pod red. Al.A. Gromyko, Ye.V.Anan’yevoy [Dilemmas of Britain: the Search for Ways of Development. Ed. by A.A. Gromyko, E.V. Ananieva]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publishers. 2014. 480 p. (In Russ.)
Greenstein F.J. Can Personality and Politics Be Studied Systematically? – Political Psychology: Key Readings. Ed. by J.T. Jost and J. Sidanius. N.Y.: Taylor & Francis Books. 2004. P. 108-123.
Herrmann R.K. Perception and Image Theory in International Relations. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 334-363.
Kauders D. Understanding Brexit Options: What future for Britain? London: Sparkling Books. 2016. 144 p.
McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. (Russ. ed.: McLuhan M. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. Moscow: Zhukovskii: Kanon-press-C. 2004. 462 p.)
Obrazy rossiiskoi vlasti. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Images of the Russian Power. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2009. 416 p. (In Russ.)
Obrazy vlasti v postsovetskoi Rossii. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Image of Power in the Post-Soviet Russia. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: Aleteya. 2004. 535 p. (In Russ.)
Osgood Ch. Studies on Generality of Affective Meaning System. – American Psychologist. 1962. Vol. 17 (1). P. 10-28.
Palitay I.S. Methodology of Political and Psychological Mass Political Consciousness Research in Transforming Society. – Political Science (RU). 2016. Special issue. P. 193-203. (In Russ.)
Psikhologiya politicheskogo vospriyatia v sovremennoi Rossii. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Psychology of Political Perception in Modern Russia. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2012. 423 p. (In Russ.)
Putin 3.0: obschestvo i vlast v noveishei istorii Rossii. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Putin 3.0: Society and Power in the Modern History of Russia. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. 2015. 420 p.
Redlawsk D.P., Lau R.R. Behavioral Decision-Making. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 130-164.
Valentino N.A., Nardis Y. Political Communication: Form And Consequence Of TheInformation Environment. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 559-590.
Zverev A.L., Palitay I.S., Rogozar A.I., Smulkina N.V. Specifics of Political Perception in Contemporary Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 3. P. 40-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.03.05
Content No. 2, 2018
See also:
Shestopal Ye.B., Rogach N.N.,
Representations of an “Ideal” as a Factor of the Perception of a Political Leader in Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No4
Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D.,
The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4
Bukreyeva O.V.,
Image of the russian power and of political leaders in the conceptual space of demotivation posters. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
Ogneva Yu.I., Kalmykov N.N.,
Expert Opinion: Image of the Ideal Politician in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No1
Zverev A.L., Palitay I.S., Smulkina N.V., Rogozar A.I.,
Specifics of Political Perception in Contemporary Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No3
.jpg)
.jpg)