Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example)

Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example)




For citation:

Teterin A.Ye. Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No. 5. P. 145-150. (In Russ.)



Abstract


Qualitative methods are ever wider adopted in political science. The fact may be explained by distinctive features both of the qualitative paradigm and of the object of political science – political reality. One of the methods of the qualitative paradigm that has received wide recognition, is media-political discourse-analysis. Norman Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of critical discourse-analysis helps to avoid some typical mistakes of a discource researcher. Illustrated (as example) with Internet-media analysis of a communication, this model demonstrates its own wide research potential extending far beyond the limits of concrete discourse practice.

 


Content No. 5, 2011

See also:


Kuchinov A.M.,
Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science: Classification Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5

Shvyrkov A.I.,
Theory, Discourse and Political Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5

Menshikov A.S.,
How to theorize politics?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1

Nisnevich Yu.A., Rozhich P.,
Lustration as instrument of counteracting corruption. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Pushkaryova G.V.,
Cognitive mechanisms of political reality construction. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1


Screen version