Rule of Provinces by Governors-General in the Russian System of Territorial Government (Essay of Historical Reminiscence)

Rule of Provinces by Governors-General in the Russian System of Territorial Government (Essay of Historical Reminiscence)


Trifonov A.G.

Mezhuyev B.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State Unversity, borismezhuev@yandex.ru


elibrary_id: 251135 |


For citation:

Trifonov A.G., Mezhuyev B.V. Rule of Provinces by Governors-General in the Russian System of Territorial Government (Essay of Historical Reminiscence) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No. 5. P. 19. (In Russ.)



Abstract
The article undertakes to analyze the activities of governors-general, or the sovereign’s deputies, in Russia of the 18th to the 19th century. Responding to the question whether it is rightful to juxtapose this institution with that of the President’s representatives the authors point to a considerable difference between the two. The governors-general had the right to suspend the decisions of local power, whereas the President’s representatives are not possessed of this right. Yet these institutions have functional similarity. Each of them is called for to carry out State supervision in the provinces, to see to the compliance of the provincial administration’s activities with the interests of supreme power. Since it upset the strict bureaucratic system of czarist Russia, the institution of governors-general faced opposition of the ministries’ officialdom and in the long run, during the 19th century, gradually lost its significance, having been retained, true, just in some few regions where the Empire’s integrity and security were found imperiled.

Content No. 5, 2000

See also:


Zakharov A.A.,
Federal State and Separatism: Canadian Case. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No3

Zubov A.B.,
Unitarianism or Federalism (To the Question of Future Organization of Russia’s State Expanse). – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No5

Galkin A.A., Fedosov P.A., Valentey S.D., Solovey V.D.,
Federalism and the Public Sphere in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No4

Kuzmin A.S., Melvin N., Nechayev V.D.,
Regional Political Regimes in Post-Soviet Russia: an Essay of a Typology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No3

Kaspe S.I.,
To Construct a Federation — Renovatio Imperii as a Method of Social Engineering. – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No5

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991