Some Approaches to the Analysis of the Language of Politics (With the Notions “Chaos”, “Leader”, “Freedom” as Examples)

Some Approaches to the Analysis of the Language of Politics (With the Notions “Chaos”, “Leader”, “Freedom” as Examples)


Sergeev V.M.,

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Principal Researcher, Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, victor04076831@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 1447 |

Sergeyev K.V., dantesanai@gmail.com



For citation:

Sergeev V.M., Sergeyev K.V. Some Approaches to the Analysis of the Language of Politics (With the Notions “Chaos”, “Leader”, “Freedom” as Examples) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 5. P. 107. (In Russ.)



Abstract
The authors discuss the possibility of linking cognitive, metaphorical and etymological approaches for the conceptual analysis of the language of politics. It is demonstrated, with concrete examples taken (“chaos”, “leader”, “freedom”), how cognitive analysis may set a certain field of meanings for etymological analysis which in its turn may turn out to be a starting position for the creation of a metalanguage of the study of concepts. Combined methods, as proved by the authors, allow not only to reconstruct distinct structures of meanings, but also to restore the generating metastructure of meanings.

Content No. 5, 2001

See also:


Tuzikov A.R.,
Mass-Media: Visible and Invisible Ideology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Meshkova T.A.,
Socio-Political Aspects of the Global Informatization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6

Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4

Klemeshev A.P., Ilyin M.V.,
Lost in Translation. Being the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5


Screen version