.jpg)
printMethodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (II)
Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich,
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Moscow, Russia
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.02.14
Rubric: Chair
For citation:
Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich Methodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (II) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 2. P. 164-173. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.02.14
Abstract
The journal continues the publication of A.A.Degtyaryov's article (for its first part see Polis, 2003, No. 1) on theories of political decision making (PDM). In this second part of the article, the author concentrates on pluralist, elitist, neo-Marxist and neo-corporatist approaches to the modelling of the PDM processes. Retracing the development and interdependence of different models, the scholar concludes that all the concepts underlying them have, as their common subject of research, political representation; which exactly makes them classifiable in one whole theoretical complex.
Full Text (электронная версия)Content No. 2, 2003
See also:
Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2
Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4
Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4
Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4
.jpg)
.jpg)