Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?

Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.01.11
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Rogozhina K.A. Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious? – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 1. P. 150-153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.01.11



Abstract

The present-time crisis condition of Russian democracy need not be a pretext for appeals to a new “revolutionary leap” to the restoration of a paternalistic-trusteeship socio-political system, the author maintains. She inquires into the reasons of the nostalgia among a part of society for such a system. In the course of her developing further the reasoning contained in R.Dahl’s “Democracy and Its Enemies”, K.A.Rogozhina points out to hopelessness of “trusteeship” in all its forms, arguing in favour of the need to create, “step by step”, an actually democratic model of society in post-communist Russia.


Content No. 1, 2004

See also:


Zamyatin D.N.,
Space and (In)security: ontological models of imagination. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3

Shaptalov B.N.,
Russia’s Choice in the Light of “Classic Democracy”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Yanov A.L.,
Slavophiles and Foreign Politics of Russia in the 19th Century.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Melville A.Yu.,
So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4


Screen version