Downfall and Restoration of a Democratic Regime in Portugal (Essay of Applying Games Theory to the Analysis of Historical Events)

Downfall and Restoration of a Democratic Regime in Portugal (Essay of Applying Games Theory to the Analysis of Historical Events)




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.06
Rubric: Version

For citation:

Larsen S.U., Hersvik J. Downfall and Restoration of a Democratic Regime in Portugal (Essay of Applying Games Theory to the Analysis of Historical Events) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 2. P. 51-63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.02.06



Abstract

The article demonstrates potentialities inherent in elementary theory of games, as applicable to the study of well known historical events. Two most significant events in recent history of Portugal were chosen as subject of study: downfall of democracy in 1926, and restoration of democratic regime in 1974. When analyzing the former of the two events, the model of “funnel of causality” was used, too, as a means of theoretically regularized interpretation of the processes that had preconditioned the event in question. In the first part of the article, published in this issue, the authors analyze the coup d’etat of 1926 as a static game between two actors (the liberal regime and the coup-makers), which was being carried on in the “orifice” of the national “funnel of causality”. As is demonstrated by the analysis, the liberal regime that was acting on the Portuguese political scene on the threshold of the 1926 coup, in actual fact was not that much “liberal”. Amidst the situation when the regime persisted in the assertion of its own infallibility, a coup d’etat began to seem the only way to changes. The alliance of the semi-loyal and the illoyal opposition — alliance that finally led to the coup d’etat — had formed by reason of the liberal regime’s not being in a position to guarantee gradual transformations.


Content No. 2, 2004

See also:


Lukin A.V.,
The Transition Period in Russia: Democratization and Liberal Reforms. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No2

Oleskin A.V.,
Network Structures of Society from the Viewpoint of Biopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1

Vorobyov D.M.,
Bearer of Legitimacy (Russian Political Tradition of Organization of the Power’s Social Address). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No5

Sokolskaya I.B.,
Is the Conservative Revolution Conservative? (On a Chronological Scale of Political Theories). – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No6

Kulpin E.S.,
How to Transform Ourselves?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2013


Sergeev V.M.
Political science of recognition

 Полный текст
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991