.jpg)
printComparison as Means of Political Theory Development
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.03.17
Rubric: Chair
For citation:
Mitrokhina T.N. Comparison as Means of Political Theory Development . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 3. P. 168-172. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.03.17
Abstract
The subject considered is the role of comparative method in political studies. Comparative analysis, in the author's opinion, is apt to effectuate a multitude of functions: it allows riddance of research from excessive influence of the subjective factor; it may help conceptualize empirical knowledge and overpass national and chronological frames. The author also raises the question of permissibility of regarding comparative method as a way of finding a procedure to be applied as substitution for experiment, impossible in social sciences.
Content No. 3, 2004
See also:
Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2
Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4
Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4
Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4
.jpg)
.jpg)