On Criteria of Elections Estimation


Ashikhmina Ya.G.

Panov P.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Leading Researcher, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, panov.petr@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 77223 | ORCID: 0000-0002-0759-7618 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-2160-2016

Podvintzev O.B., ipl@mail.ru



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.04.11


For citation:

Ashikhmina Ya.G., Panov P.V., Podvintzev O.B. On Criteria of Elections Estimation . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 4. P. 139-146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.04.11



Abstract

The study of elections is such a domain within political analysis, of which the conceptual-methodological basis and the set of investigative instruments, as the authors of the article maintain, are yet far from being elaborated to the full. Thus, they point to the still lacking standard criteria that would enable typology, classification and estimation of elections. In this article, the authors make an attempt to offer universally applicable criteria of estimation of elections, proceeding from their two main characteristics: predictability and competitiveness.


Content No. 4, 2004

See also:


Mironyuk M.G.,
Human Dimension of Federalism (Federalist Theories and Tendencies of the Federative Relations’ Development in Russia). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Kovalev V.A., Shabayev Yu.P.,
Ethnicity and Fellow-Citizenship (Ethno-National Movements in Finno-Ugrian Regions of the Russian Federation). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Streltzina M.M.,
Institutional Conditions of Setting Up Governmental Departments in Russia and in the USA (With Russia’s Emergency Situations Ministry and the U.S. Homeland Security Department as Example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Khlopin A.D.,
Deformalization of Rules: Cause or Consequence of Institutional Traps?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Panov P.V.,
Alteration of Electoral Institutions in Russia (Cross-Regional Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6


Screen version