Process of Decision-Making-and-Realizing in Public Policy: Dynamic Cycle and Its Main Phases

Process of Decision-Making-and-Realizing in Public Policy:
Dynamic Cycle and Its Main Phases


Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich,

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Moscow, Russia



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.04.13
Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich Process of Decision-Making-and-Realizing in Public Policy: Dynamic Cycle and Its Main Phases . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 4. P. 158-168. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.04.13



Abstract

The article presents investigation of the model of a political governance cycle, of the model’s heuristic potential for studying the process of political decision making. Discussing the stronger and the weaker sides of the model, the authors finally come to the conclusion that for all its relatively low explaining potential and its inaptitude to disclose the inner relations, tendencies and dependencies proper to the systems of decision making, it is an effective instrument of putting empirical information in order and can and must be used, as such, by specialists in state governance. In the concluding part of the article, the author dwells on criteria of dividing a political governance cycle into single phases, and analyzes in detail the content of the first phase, in so far as it involves determining societal priority problems and the agenda formation.


Content No. 4, 2004

See also:


Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4

Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4

Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
4 2015


Kozhokin E.M.
The Last of the Utopians? (M.Ya. Hefter: Ad Memoriam)

 Полный текст
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991