Patterns of the Development of Industrial Relations Management under Globalization

Patterns of the Development of Industrial Relations Management under Globalization




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.06.04

For citation:

Pavlova T.V. Patterns of the Development of Industrial Relations Management under Globalization . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.06.04



Abstract

Applying institutional approach, the author of this article based on western sources, retraces changes going on in the sphere of industrial relations management in economically developed countries under the influence of the processes of globalization and localization. Existence of two ideal types of these countries is noted: those styled as liberal market economies, and as coordinated liberal economies, — which differently respond to the above-mentioned processes. Primary attention is given to the experience of the European Union. The appearance of a global, supranational level of management and, besides, the growing role of the local level (the level of enterprises) are stated. It is argued that adaptation of the institutions discussed to the new conditions of functioning lies to a great extent with “institutional heritage”.


Content No. 6, 2004

See also:


Mironyuk M.G.,
Human Dimension of Federalism (Federalist Theories and Tendencies of the Federative Relations’ Development in Russia). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Kovalev V.A., Shabayev Yu.P.,
Ethnicity and Fellow-Citizenship (Ethno-National Movements in Finno-Ugrian Regions of the Russian Federation). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Ashikhmina Ya.G., Panov P.V., Podvintzev O.B.,
On Criteria of Elections Estimation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Streltzina M.M.,
Institutional Conditions of Setting Up Governmental Departments in Russia and in the USA (With Russia’s Emergency Situations Ministry and the U.S. Homeland Security Department as Example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Khlopin A.D.,
Deformalization of Rules: Cause or Consequence of Institutional Traps?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6


Screen version