.jpg)
printCommon history and different destinies of the two Korean states
Rubric: Reflecting on matters in print
For citation:
Fedorovsky A.N. Common history and different destinies of the two Korean states . – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No. 5. P. 181-186. (In Russ.)
Abstract
It cannot but be pointed first of all to the character of studying the history of Korea after 1945, as it emerges from the annotated book: it is innovatory in the Russian science. The key theses of the authors’ concept are based on thorough analysis of the tendencies in the development of both the KPDR and the RK – analysis taking into consideration political and socio-economic processes that have been taking place in both Korean states for the past six decades.
Content No. 5, 2009
See also:
Lukin A.L.,
Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Political Realism and Empathy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No3
Toloraya G.D., Torkunov A.V.,
Nuclear and Missile Threat on the Korean Peninsula: Origins and Response Measures. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4
Korgun I.A., Toloraya G.D.,
On the question of effectiveness of sanctions against DPRK. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No3
Inoguchi T.,
Political Science in Three Democracies, Disaffected (Japan), Third Wave (Korea) and Fledgeling (China). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Streltsov D.V., Chugrov S.V., Karelova L.B., Oznobishchev S.K.,
Russia and Japan. Part II. View from Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1
.jpg)
.jpg)