.jpg)
printPerception of Europe by Young Generation in the Context of New Reality of World Politics (The Case of Krasnodar)
Samarkina I.V.,
Associate Professor, Kuban State University, smrkn@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 186730 | ORCID: 0000-0002-0205-8543 | RESEARCHER_ID: A-4728-2017
Morozova E.V.,
Professor of the Department for Public Policy and Public Administration, Kuban State University, morozova_e@inbox.ru
elibrary_id: 388085 | ORCID: 0000-0002-1369-7594 | RESEARCHER_ID: R-9250-2016
Miroshnichenko I.V.,
Associate Professor, Head of Department for Public Policy and Public Administration, Kuban State University, mirinna78@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 384930 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2650-6662 | RESEARCHER_ID: Q-7280-2016
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.03.08
Rubric: Russia Today
For citation:
Samarkina I.V., Morozova E.V., Miroshnichenko I.V. Perception of Europe by Young Generation in the Context of New Reality of World Politics (The Case of Krasnodar). – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 3. P. 110-129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.08
Abstract
In the context of large-scale geopolitical changes, the study of the subjective space of politics and mechanisms for its design takes on great importance. It can define the images of political actors and the results of their perception by different social communities. The article presents results of the study aimed to define how young people perceive the image of Europe. The model of social perception of the object consists of several key components: the content of image (objective parameters), the factors influencing the perception of this image (contextual, communicative and subjective), and the functions of image that affect the national identity formation. The main method of collecting empirical data was discussion in focus groups formed by people from various segments of youth from Krasnodar and the region. To stimulate discussion, a number of techniques were used: projective drawing, methodology of unfinished sentences, mapping, semantic differential technique, scaling. To assess and conceptualize the data obtained, the results were discussed with experts. The explanatory model of the image of Europe proposed in the study allows us to cover the complexity, multidimensionality and interdependence of its structural elements. Being part of subjective space of politics, the image of Europe consists of rational and unconscious components that have verbal and visual projections in a system of cognitive, affective and behavioral attitudes and are changing under the influence of a complex of structural and dynamic factors. The image of Europe in the notions of modern youth is represented by a multi-level and multi-component dynamic design. Due to the impact of a system of external and internal factors, mechanisms and institutions of socialization, targeted and spontaneous influences, components of the image of Europe are structured into a system of basic constants and variables. Our study showed that the constant parameters of the image are formed, as a rule, under the influence of structural factors, while variable parameters – under the influence of dynamic factors. The most important “perceptual screen” affecting the “core” of the image of Europe in the perception of our respondents is the education system. As for peripheral components, Internet resources play a crucial role in their formation, especially such as social networks, blogs and online games. The study also showed existence of a generation gap in the youth’s perception of the image of Europe, which is mainly based on personal experience of acquaintance with the European countries.
Keywords
identity; image of Europe, perception; youth; Other / Stranger; personalized images; generation gap.
References
Bederson V.D. V poiskah geroev: raznoobrazie personalistskih identifikatorov i politika identichnosti v regionah sovremennoj Rossii [Searching the Heroes: the Diversity of Personalized Identificators and Identity politics in Regions of Modern Russia]. – Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 3: Politicheskie funkcii mifov. Moscow: INION RAS. 2015. P. 192-209. (In Russ.)
Castells M. Communication power. (Russ. ed.: Castells M. Vlast‘ kommunikacii. Moscow: Publ. of Higher School of Economics. 2016. 579 p.)
Chaban N., Elgstrom O., Kelly S., Yi L. Images of the EU beyond its Borders: Issue-Specific and Regional Perceptions of European Union Power and Leadership. − Journal of Common Market Studies. 2013. Vol. 51. No. 3. Р. 433−451.
Davyborets E.N. Rol’ faktorov sub”ektivnogo vospriyatii ob”ekta v formirovanii imidzha gosudarstva (Role of Factors of Subjective Object Perception in Formation of the State’’s Image). − Vestnik ZabGU [Gerald of Baikal State university]. 2015. No. 10 (125). P. 41−49. (In Russ.)
Dias V.A. The EU and Russia: Competing Discourses, Practices and Interests in the Shared Neighborhood. – Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 2013. Vol. 14. No. 2. Р. 256-271.
Egorova-Gantman E.V., Pleshakov K.V. Politicheskaya reklama [Political Advertizing]. Moscow: Nikkolo M Publ. 2002. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Elgstrom O. Outsiders’ Perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations. − Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007. Vol. 45. No. 4. Р. 949−967.
Erikson E. Identity: Youth and Crisis. (Russ. ed.: Erikson E. Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis. Moscow: Flinta Publ. 2006. 352 p.)
Evtushenko A.S., Sazantovich A.B., Samarkina I.V. Evropa v vospriyatii sosedei: problemy, metodiki i rezul’taty sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovanii [Europe in Perception of Neighbors: Problems, Techniques and Results of Modern Foreign Researches]. − Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie [Human. Community. Management]. 2016. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 45−61. (In Russ.)
Kask K., Hannust T. Does a Dozen Years Change a Thing? Estonian Children’s Drawings of Europe in 2000 and 2012. − Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013. Vol. 17. No. 3. Р. 301-312.
Kiselev I.Yu., Smirnova A.G. Dinamika obraza gosudarstva v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Dynamics of a State Image in International Relations]. St. Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg State University. 2006. 376 p. (In Russ.)
Kostyaev S.S. Imidzh Rossii v SShA: analiz ekzogennykh i endogennykh faktorov [Russia’s Image in The USA: Analysis of Endogenous and Exogenous Factors]. − Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2015. No. 2 (18). P. 14-21. (In Russ.)
Lapkin V.V., Semenenko I.S. “Homo politicus” vs challenges of “infomodernity”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No. 6. P. 64-81. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/en/article/4780 (accessed 06.04.2018).
Lucarelli S. Seen from the Outside: The State of the Art on the External Image of the EU. − Journal of European Integration. 2013. Vol. 35. No. 6. Р. 1-16.
Medvedev D.A. Realizatsii resursa “myagkoi sily” vo vneshnepoliticheskoi strategii Rossii [Realization of a “Soft Power” Resource In the Foreign Policy Strategy of Russia]. – Soft Power, myagkaya sila, myagkaya vlast’. Mezhdistsiplinarnyi analiz. Sost. i red. E.G. Borisova. 3-e izd. [Soft Power. Cross-Disciplinary Analysis. Ed. by E.G. Borisova. 3rd ed.]. Moscow: Flinta. 2016. P. 11-12. (In Russ.)
Mason R. School Children’s Visualizations of Europe. − European Educational Research Journal. 2012. Vol. 11. No. 1. Р. 145-165.
Mead G. Aziya [Asia]. − Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl’: Teksty. Pod. red. V.I. Dobren’kova [American Sociological Thought: Texts. Ed. by V.I. Dobrenkov]. Moscow: Moscow University Press. 1994. P. 122-128. (In Russ.)
Muff Sh. To Agonistic Model of Democracy. – Logos. 2004. No. 2 (42). P. 180-197. (In Russ.)
Narbut N.P., Trocuk I.V. Images of Neighboring Countries in the Perception of Students (Results of Sociological Studies). – RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2011. No. 4. P. 109-117. (In Russ.)
O’Tuathail G., Dalby S. Introduction: Rethinking Geopolitics: Towards a Critical Geopolitics. London: Routledge. 1998. 133 p.
Obraz Rossii v strane i za rubezhom: gumanitarnoe izmerenie. Pod red. Yu.P. Zinchenko, L.V. Matveevoi [Image of Russia in the Country and Abroad: Humanitarian Measurement. Ed. by Yu.P. Zinchenko, L.V. Matveeva]. Moscow: Moscow University Press. 2008. 123 p. (In Russ.)
Parshin P.B. Priklyucheniya myagkoi sily v mire kommunikativnykh tekhnologii (prekrasnodushnye zametki) [Adventures of Soft Power in the World of Communicative Technologies (Starry-Eyed Notes)]. – Soft Power, myagkaya sila, myagkaya vlast’. Mezhdistsiplinarnyi analiz. Sost. i red. E.G. Borisova. 3-e izd. [Soft Power. Cross-Disciplinary Analysis. Ed. by E.G. Borisova. 3rd ed.].Moscow: Flinta. 2016. P. 2-7. (In Russ.)
Plotichkina N.V. Prosumption as a Political Practice in a “Producer-Consumer Environment”. − RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2013. No. 3. P. 66−79. (In Russ.)
Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D. The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No. 4. P. 107-121. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/en/article/4307 (accessed 06.04.2018).
Portela C. The Perception of the European Union in The Southeast Asia. − Asia Europe Journal. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 2. Р. 149−160.
Psikhologiya politicheskogo vospriyatiya v sovremennoi Rossii. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Psychology of Political Perception in Modern Russia. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ. 2012. 423 p. (In Russ.)
Samarkina I.V. Sub’ektivnoe prostranstvo politiki – Identichnost’. Lichnost’.Obshchestvo. Politika. Enciklopedicheskoe izdanie [Subjective Space of Politics. – Identity: The Individual, Society and Politics]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. 2017. P. 380-362. (In Russ.)
Schmitt C. Concept of Political. − Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. No. 1. P. 37-67. (In Russ.)
Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. Russia’s Image in the West: Dialectics of Ideas in the Context of the World Development (By Way of Posing the Problem). – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 6. P. 110-124 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.06.08
Sheigal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of Political Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena Publ. 2000. 368 p. (In Russ.)
Shestopal E.B. Obraz i imidzh v politicheskom vospriyatii: aktual’nye problemy issledovaniya [Images in Political Perception: Actual Problems of Studies]. − Obrazy gosudarstv, natsii i liderov. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Images of States, Nations and Leaders. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 2008. P. 8-24. (In Russ.)
Shestopal Ye.B., Gubchenko V.A., Dzhamaludinov Sh.Z., Dzhgamadze K.B., Tumysov I.A. Images of EU in Russia: Problem of Perception. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 3. P. 12-24 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.03.03
Torney D. External Perceptions an EU Foreign Policy Effectiveness: The Case of Climate Change. − Journal of Common Market Studies. 2014. Vol. 52. No. 6. Р. 1358-1373.
Vedernikova M.I. Objective and Subjective Factors of Perception of Russia’s Image in the EU. − RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2016. No. 2. P. 53-60. (In Russ.)
Žižek S. The Sublime Object of Ideology. (Russ. ed.: Žižek S. Vozvyshennyi ob”ekt ideologii. Moscow: Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. 1999. 114 p.)
Content No. 3, 2018
See also:
Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D.,
The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4
Samarkina I.V., Bashmakov I.S.,
Local Identity and Mechanisms of its Conversion into Constructive Socio-Political Practices of Youth. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No2
Evgenyeva T.V., Smulkina N.V., Tsymbal I.A.,
Russia’s Place in the World in the Perception of National Citizens: Identification Dimension. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No4
Shestopal Ye.B.,
Political leadership in new environment: the change of the perception paradigm. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3
Peregudov S.P.,
National-state identity and the problems of the russian state’s consolidation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3
.jpg)
.jpg)