print

The Ideology of Hamas:
From Radical Islamism to Rational Practicality?

Krylov A.V.,

Professor of the Department of Oriental Studies, Leading Researcher, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University, avkrylov2004@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 644251 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3132-8995 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAH-9812-2019

Morozov V.M.,

Vice-Rector for Personnel Policy, Associate Professor, Department of Diplomacy, MGIMO University, frosti_fddf@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 690373 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.04.07

Rubric: Orbis Terrarum

For citation:

Krylov A.V., Morozov V.M. The Ideology of Hamas: From Radical Islamism to Rational Practicality? – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 4. P. 84-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.07

Abstract

The article focuses on the analysis of the ideology that defines the military-political doctrine of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), which for more than thirty years, along with Fatah, is the most influential political force in the territories controlled by the Palestinian National Authority. The study shows that the ideology of Hamas, developed by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, is based on two components: the classical Salafi concepts of the Muslim Brotherhood society founders and the national-religious doctrine and political practice of Sheikh Izz al-Din al-Kassam who was very popular among the marginal unity of the Palestinian society in the 1930s. The main source for studying the ideology of HAMAS is the Charter of the Islamic Resistance Movement. The anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli and frankly jihadist provisions embodied in the document by HAMAS militants in practice have had an extremely unfavorable effect on the already strained Palestinian-Israeli relations. The process of Oslo was curtailed, and the arrival of HAMAS to power actually blocked the activities of the “quartet” of international mediators and other efforts to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The strengthening of HAMAS also split the Palestinian society. The program document analyzed in the article demonstrates that the new political leadership of the organization understands that in the current deadlock situation it requires more flexible approaches to solve the important foreign policy issues. This, in particular, is evidenced by the recent cardinal reform of the Charter of the Islamic Resistance Movement.

Keywords

Middle East; Israel; Palestinian National Administration; Arab-Israeli conflict; Palestinian problem; threats and challenges of radical Islam; Hamas; Middle East settlement.

 Full Text 

Gunning J. Hamas in Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. 2009. 310 p.

Krylov A.V., Sorokina N.M. The Analysis of the Principal Documents of the Palestinian-Israeli Peace Negotiations Process after the Signing of the Oslo Accords, 1996-2001. – Best Works of the Scientists from the Institute for International Studies. 1st edition. Ed. by A. A. Orlov. Moscow: MGIMO-University publications. 2013. 82 p.

Morris В. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001. New York: Vintage Books, Random House. 2001. 665 p.

Razhdadinov M.Z. Egipetskoe dvijenie “Bratiev musulman [The Society of the Muslim Brothers]. Moscow: Institute for the Study of Israel and the Middle East. 2003. 432 p. (In Russ.)

Ribhi Sayed Samara. Islamskoe dvijenie v Palestine: 1928-1988. Avtoreferat na soiskanie uchonoy stpeni kandidata istoricheskih nauk [The Islamic Movement in Palestine: 1928-1988. The dissertation author’s ab­stract for the scientific degree of the candidate of historical sciences]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. 2002. 18 p. (In Russ.)

Sadakat Kadri. Heaven on Earth: A Journey through Shari’a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia. London: Macmillan. 2012. 160 p.

Scham Р., Abu-Irshaid О. Special Report. Hamas: Ideological Rigidity and Political Flexibility. Washington: United States Institute of Peace. 2009. 24 p.

The Hamas Charter (1988). The Full Text in English and Arabic. Ramat ha-Sharon, Israel: Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S). 2006. 16 p.

See also: