.jpg)
printThe Institutionalization of Ethnicity in the Identity Policy of Russian Republics:
Conceptual Analysis
Nazukina M.V.,
Researcher at the Department for the Study of Political Institutions and Processes, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Perm State National Research University, nazukina@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 251245 | ORCID: 0000-0003-0190-0513 | RESEARCHER_ID: : L-8246-2016
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.03.06
Rubric: Russia Today
For citation:
Nazukina M.V. The Institutionalization of Ethnicity in the Identity Policy of Russian Republics: Conceptual Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 3. P. 78-92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.03.06
The study has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No 19-011-00810 А).
Abstract
This article discusses the theoretical and methodological aspects of the manifestation of ethnicity and of its institutionalization in the regional identity policy of Russian republics. The author analyzes how ethnicity is included in politics. Indicators are identified that indicate the expression of ethnicity in identity politics. Identity policies as policies promoted by state actors are regarded as systemic and aimed at institutionalizing ethnic categories thus helping create and sustain a sense of “Us – Them” and form subjective assessments towards such categories. The use of socio-constructivist methodology leads us to the conclusion that identification and institutionalization are related processes that occur simultaneously and mutually reinforce each other. The institutionalization of ethnicity is manifested in the rooting of ethnic categories in the political process of the republics and their role of maintaining or changing the regional institutional order. Building on this assumption, the author proposes an analytical model based on the allocation of three levels of the process of ethnicity institutionalization in identity politics: the normative, the narrative-mythological, and the symbolic level. The normative level includes the establishment of ethnic categories in the political nstitutions of the region and is manifested in the normative consolidation of ethnic discourse, i.e. in normative documents, in the distribution of power positions, in language policies expressing ethnic preferences etc. The narrativemythological level determines the significance of ethnic markers in the discourse of regional historical memory and myth-making. The symbolic level is defined as the incorporation of ethnicity into the symbolic attributes of the region. A set of indicators can be used to operationalize this three-level model in empirical studies of ethnicity institutionalization in Russian republics.
Keywords
ethnicity, identity policy, institutionalization, methodology, national republics, Russia, political order, comparative analysis.
References
Archiles F., Marti M. 2001. Ethnicity, Region and Nation: Valencian Identity and the Spanish NationState. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. Vol. 24. No. 5. P. 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120063972
Beland D. 2017. Identity, Politics, and Public Policy. – Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1159140
Bernstein M. 2005. Identity Politics. – Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 31. P. 47-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100054
Bieber F. 2004. Institutionalizing Ethnicity in the Western Balkans. Managing Change in Deeply Divided Societies. – ECMI Working Paper. No. 19. Flensburg (Germany): European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI). URL: http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2009/1899/pdf/working_paper_19.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2020).
Brunila К., Rossi L.-M. 2018. Identity Politics, the Ethos of Vulnerability, and Education. – Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 50. No. 3. P. 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1343115
Castells M. 2009. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 584 p.
Clammer J. 1982. The Institutionalization of Ethnicity: The Culture of Ethnicity in Singapore. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1982.9993365
Fearon J.D. 2003. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. – Journal of Economic Growth. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 195-222.
Hechter M. 2000. Containing Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 268 p. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00091
Jenkins R. 2008. Rethinking ethnicity: Arguments and explorations. London: SAGE Publications. 207 p.
Johnson C., Coleman A. 2012. The Internal Other: Exploring the Dialectical Relationship Between Regional Exclusion and the Construction of National Identity. – Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Vol. 102. No. 4. P. 863-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.602934
Kaltmeier O., Raab J., Thies S. 2012. Multiculturalism and Beyond: The New Dynamics of Identity Politics in the Americas. – Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2012.686327
Klandermans P.G. 2014. Identity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Protest. – Political Psychology. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12167
Lieberman E.S., Singh P. Institutionalized Ethnicity and Civil War. 39 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254063662_Institutionalized_Ethnicity_and_Civil_War (accessed 19.03.2020).
Orjuela C. 2014. Corruption and Identity Politics in Divided Societies. – Third World Quarterly. Vol. 35. No. 5. P. 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.921426
Panov P. 2016. In Search of Inter-Ethnic Balance: Ethnic Composition and Informal Power-Sharing in Russian National Republics. – European Politics and Society. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1183744
Rose-Redwood R.S. 2008. From Number to Name: Symbolic Capital, Places of Memory and the Politics of Street Renaming in New York City. – Social & Cultural Geography. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802032702
Wald N. 2013. Bridging Identity Divides in Current Rural Social Mobilization. – Identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 598-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.819001
Barth F. 2006. Introduction. – Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Ed. by F. Barth. (Russ. ed.: Barth F. Vvedenie. – Etnicheskie gruppy i sotsial’nye granitsy. Sotsial’naya organizatsiya kul’turnykh razlichii. Ed. by F. Barth. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. P. 9-48.)
Berger P.L., Luckmann T. 1995. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Berger P.L., Luckmann T. Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. Moscow: Medium. 323 p.)
Brubaker R. 2012. Ethnicity Without Groups. (Russ. ed.: Brubaker R. Etnichnost’ bez grupp. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House. 408 p.)
Drobizheva L.M. 2011. Etnicheskaya identichnost’ [Ethnic Identity]. – Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti. V 2 tomakh. T. 1. Slovar’ terminov i ponyatii. [Political Identity and Identity Politics. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. Glossary of terms and concepts]. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. Moscow: ROSSPEN. P. 130-134. (In Russ.)
Malinova O.Yu. 2017. Identity Politics as a Struggle for Meanings: The Challenge of Conceptualization. – Symbolic Politics: Collection of Scientific Papers. Vol. 5: Identity Policy. Ed. by O.Yu. Malinova. Мoscow: INION RAN. P. 7-20. (In Russ.) URL: http://inion.ru/site/assets/files/1560/symbolic_politics_5_2017.pdf (accessed 19.03.2020).
Mukharyamov N.M. 2011. Towards the Semantics of Ethnopolitical. – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 11-28. (In Russ.)
Nazukina M.V. 2018. Markers of Ethnicity in the Regional Identity of Russia’’s Republics. – Regionology. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 698–717. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.105.026.201804.698-717
Osipov A.G. 2009. Mekhanizmy institutsionalizatsii etnichnosti [Mechanisms for the Institutionalization of Ethnicity]. – Soobshchestva kak politicheskii fenomen [Communities as a Political Phenomenon]. Ed. by P.V. Panov, K.A. Sulimov, L.A. Fadeeva. Moscow: ROSSPEN. P. 202-222. (In Russ.)
Panov P.V. 2011. Instituty, identichnosti, praktiki: teoreticheskaya model’ politicheskogo poryadka [Institutions, Identities, Practices: Theoretical Model of the Political Order]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 230 p. (In Russ.)
Panov P.V. 2019. ‘Language Question’ on the Public and Institutional Agendas: a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Minorities in the Regions of Russia. – Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 111-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2019-3-111-121
Pushkaryova G.V. 2017. Ideas and Values as a Method of Constructing Symbolic Space of the National Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 156-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11
Regulirovanie etnopoliticheskoi konfliktnosti i podderzhanie grazhdanskogo soglasiya v usloviyakh kul’turnogo raznoobraziya: modeli, podkhody, praktiki. Analiticheskii doklad [Regulating Interethnic Conflicts and Building Civic Concord in a World of Cultural Diversity: Models, Approaches, and Practices. Analytical report]. 2017. Ed. by I. Semenenko. Moscow: IMEMO. 229 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2017/2017_018.pdf (accessed 19.03.2020).
Sagitova L.V. 2018. Respublika Tatarstan: politika identichnosti i ee aktory [Republic of Tatarstan: Politics of Identity and Its Actors]. Kazan: Shigabutdin Marjani Institute of History, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan. 360 p. (In Russ.)
Semenenko I.S. 2017a. Politika identichnosti [Identity Politics]. – Identichnost: Lichnost, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia]. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. Moscow: VES MIR. P. 647-655. (In Russ.)
Semenenko I.S. 2017b. Politika identichnosti v usloviyakh etnokul’turnogo mnogoobraziya: novaya povestka dnya [Ethnocultural Diversity and Identity Politics]. – Identichnost: Lichnost, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia]. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. Moscow: VES MIR. P. 102-113. (In Russ.)
Tishkov V.A. 2003. Rekviem po etnosu: Issledovaniya po sotsial’no-kul’turnoi antropologii [Requiem for Ethnicity: Research on Socio-Cultural Anthropology]. Moscow: Nauka. 544 p.
Zavadskaya M.A. 2009. Problem of Political Institutionalization Measurement: The State of Contemporary Studies. – Political Science (RU). No. 3. P. 56-70. (In Russ.)
Content No. 3, 2020
See also:
Rutland P.,
The presence of absence: ethnicity policy in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2
Kovalev V.A., Shabayev Yu.P.,
Ethnicity and Fellow-Citizenship (Ethno-National Movements in Finno-Ugrian Regions of the Russian Federation). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4
Evgenyeva T.V., Titov V.V.,
Nation-State Identity Formation of the Russian Youth. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No
Gabdrakhmanova G.F.,
Discursive Identity Construction in Messages to the Regional Parliament. Case of the Republic of Tatarstan. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5
Shkel S.N.,
Bastions of Tradition: The Ethnic Factor and Machine Politics in the Russian Regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
.jpg)
.jpg)