print

Digital technologies and new goals of innovation policy

Ivanova N.I.,

Doctor of Economics, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, n.i.ivanova@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 105454 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.06

Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Ivanova N.I. Digital technologies and new goals of innovation policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 1. P. 53-66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.06

The article was prepared with support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for the project “World order after the crisis: challenges and technologies, competition and cooperation” (№ 075-15-2020-783).

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the digital technologies influence on the national innovation system transformation and related changes in goals and government innovation policy. The author elaborates the idea that the leading global companies of digital economy based their technological and market power on intensive research and development activity. Prolonged investment in new knowledge, new technologies and global innovation make IT companies the leaders and dominant segment of innovation systems. It is constantly growing, rising their own material and financial resources turning independent from the government. Moreover, they have their own technology policy being sometimes in contradiction with the governments of different levels. National as well as foreign. The problem is especially strong because the leading IT companies acting as monopolists on the foreign markets. The technology protection policy and other new form of new digital regulation are going globally. 

Keywords

innovation competition, digital platforms, technology corporations, technological sovereignty, monopolization.

 Full Text 

Acemoglu, D. (2021). Remaking the post-COVID world. Finance and Development. IMF.

Aghion, Ph., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2021). The power of creative destruction: economic upheaval and the wealth of nations. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Banik, N., & Padalkar, М. (2021). The spread of gig economy: trends and effects. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.19.29

Blandin-Obernesser, A. (2016). Les entreprises souveraines de l’Internet: un défi pour le droit en Europe. In A. Blandin-Obernesser, Droits et souveraineté numérique en Europe (pp. 95-105). Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Morin-Desailly, С. (2014). Nouveau rôle et nouvelle stratégie pour l’Union européenne dans la gou­vernance mondiale de l’Internet. Rapport d’information n° 696 (2013-2014). Tome I. https://www.senat.fr/rap/r13-696-1/r13-696-11.pdf 

Ivanova, N.I. (2019). Technological Breakthrough in the Modern Economy. Еkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 12(3), 6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X‑2019-12-3-6-16

Mamedyarov, Z.A. (2020). Innovatsii i fondovyi rynok [Innovations and the Stock Market]. In N.I. Ivanova (Ed.), Innovatsionnaya konkurentsiya [Innovation competition] (pp. 119-135). Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

Piketty, T. (2016). Le Capital au ХХIe siècle. (Russ. ed.: Piketty, T. Kapital v XXI veke. Moscow: Ves Mir).

Shelyubskaya, N.V. (2020). Praktika regulirovaniya konkurentsii v ES [The practice of competition regulation in the EU]. In N.I. Ivanova (Ed.), Innovatsionnaya konkurentsiya [Innovation competition] (pp. 151-173). Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

Srnicek, N. (2020). Platform capitalism. (Russ. ed.: Srnicek, N. Kapitalizm platform. Moscow: Ves Mir). 

See also: