.jpg)
printResearch optics and methodological perspectives of contemporary ethnopoliitical science
Borisova N.V.,
Perm State University, Perm, Russia, borisova_nv@psu.ru
elibrary_id: 77227 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4516-0820 | RESEARCHER_ID: G-8490-2018
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.15
Rubric: Reflecting on Matters in Print
For citation:
Borisova N.V. Research optics and methodological perspectives of contemporary ethnopoliitical science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 1. P. 184-191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.15
Abstract
The monograph by P.V. Oskolkov “Essays on ethnopolitical studies” (Moscow: Aspect Press, 2021) is devoted to recent developments and the current state of the ethnopolitics academic literature. Referring to a wide range of ethnopolitical studies, the author focuses on the categorical apparatus and characteristics of its methodological framework. The author considers issues such as the nation and ethnicity, nationalism and the national state, ethnopolitics and language, ethnic voting and party politics. He employs a wide range of research approaches and theoretical solutions to explain their nature, dynamics, variability. P. Oskolkov outlines and concretizes ethnopolitical studies as a social and interdisciplinary field of knowledge. This monograph is interesting on account of the critical review of concepts that it offers, the theories it expands on and its illustrative content. It also vividly and succinctly explains the nature of the discussed ethnopolitical phenomena.
Keywords
ethnopolitics, ethnopolitical studies, nationalism, nation, ethnic group, ethnopolitical conflict, politicization of ethnicity.
References
Busch, B. (2013). Linguistic rights and language policy: a south–north dialogue. Education As Change. No. 2. Vol. 17. P. 209-218.
Esman, M. (1994). Ethnic politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 304 p.
Gadelii, K. (1999). Language planning: theory and practice. Evaluation of language planning cases worldwide. UNESCO.
Kloss, H. (1977). The American bilingual tradition. Rowley: Newbury House.
Anderson, B. (2001). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. (Russ. ed.: Anderson, B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow: KANON-press-C, Kuchkovo pole).
Danilov, M. (2010). The concept of “politicization” in scientific and socio-political discourse. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. No. 2. P. 92-96. https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2010-10-2-92-96
Etnicheskie gruppy i sotsial’nye granitsy. Sotsial’naya organizatsiya kul’turnykh razlichii [Ethnic groups and social boundaries. The social organization of cultural differences]. (2006). Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo.
Gurr, T. (2005). Why men rebel. (Russ. ed.: Gurr, T. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. St. Petersburg: Piter).
Hobsbawm, E. (1998). Nations and nationalism since 1780. (Russ. ed.: Hobsbawm, E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. St. Petersburg: Aletheia).
Kanevsky, A. (2015). Language policy as a kind of national policy of the state. Philosophy of law. No. 4. P. 41-51.
Oskolkov, P. (2021). Ocherki po etnopolitologii [Essays on ethnopolitics]. Moscow: Aspect Press.
Riggs, F. (2000). Aspects of the content of ethnicity. In Ethnos and politics. Moscow: URAO Publ. P. 9-12
Schweitzer, A. (1977). Sovremennaya sotsiolingvistika: teoriya, problemy, metody [Modern sociolinguistics: theory, problems, methods]. Moscow: Nauka.
Schweitzer, A., Nikolsky L. (1978). Vvedenie v sotsiolingvistiku [Introduction to sociolinguistics]. Moscow: Higher School.
Content No. 1, 2022
See also:
Rutland P.,
The presence of absence: ethnicity policy in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2
Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I.,
Classifying Ethnic Conflicts: Challenges for Political Theory and Methodology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6
Prokhorenko I.L.,
Ethnopolitical Conflict and Politics of Identity in Latin America. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4
Shkel S.N.,
Bastions of Tradition: The Ethnic Factor and Machine Politics in the Russian Regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
Prokhorenko I.L.,
Possibilities of Spatial Approach in Analysis of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6
.jpg)
.jpg)