print

The subjective space of youth policy:
theoretical model and regional projections (the case of the Krasnodar territory)

Samarkina I.V.,

Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia, smrkn@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 186730 | ORCID: 0000-0002-0205-8543 | RESEARCHER_ID: A-4728-2017

Miroshnichenko I.V.,

Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia, mirinna78@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 384930 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2650-6662 | RESEARCHER_ID: Q-7280-2016

Borisko O.A.,

Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia, olgbor@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 492628 | ORCID: 0000-0003-0097-3796 | RESEARCHER_ID: GNP-1403-2022

Article received: 2022.01.31. Accepted: 2022.06.21
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.05.08

Rubric: Russia today

For citation:

Samarkina I.V., Miroshnichenko I.V., Borisko O.A. The subjective space of youth policy: theoretical model and regional projections (the case of the Krasnodar territory). – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 5. P. 99-116. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.08

The reported study was funded by RFBR and EISR according to the research project № 21-011-31480 “Youth policy in a Russian region: Ideas and expectations of young people VS practices and technologies”.

Abstract

The article presents the results of a subjective space study as part of sectoral policy. The authors present a theoretical model and its empirical content based on the case of a youth policy study in the Krasnodar Territory. A conceptual model of the subjective space of sectoral policy as an invariant of the subjective space of policy is described on the basis of theoretical analysis. The article determines the structure and mechanisms of interaction between institutional practices and non-institutional aspects of youth policy implementation. The subjective space of youth policy in modern society is a complex and multidimensional object, as the study has shown (it is considered in the context of contradictory interaction with the world of real youth policy). The semantic profile of the State youth policy was described according to the results of an empirical study of young people in the Krasnodar Territory. This profile captures the detachment of young people – the gap between youth policy and the interests and needs of young people. The authors also define the motives for youth participation in the practices implemented by the State youth policy, identify the formats of youth policy demanded by youth, and assess the potential for social activity of the region’s youth. The authors conclude that social projects and initiatives for the development of territories, the activities of political parties, and local public self-government have the maximum potential for involving young people in social activities. The formats of youth policy that are most in demand among young people are the following: youth self-government, creative activity in the form of forums and creative spaces, the activities of various youth public organizations. The article shows the inconsistency of young people’s ideas about youth policy and the differentiation of the youth cohort. Resources for updating the content and formats of youth policy and key content of youth policy that will resonate with the youth environment (human, digital society, healthy lifestyle and nature) are also identified. Based on the results of an empirical study, an innovative model of the Russian youth policy is substantiated, which allows the authors to make recommendations regarding the formation of successful institutional practices. 

Keywords

subjective space of politics, subjective space of youth policy, youth policy, youth, state youth policy .

Дополнительные материалы

Приложение 

 Full Text

Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Sangnier, M. (2011). Efficient and inefficient welfare states. IZA DP, 5445. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1745720

Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C.R. Snyder, S.J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 463-473). Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hart, R.A. (2008). Stepping back from ‘the ladder’: reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In A. Raid et al. (Ed.), Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and The Environment, Health and Sustainability (pp. 19-31). New York, NY: Springer.

Kamara, J. (2008). Youth policy: what works and what doesn’t. a review of youth policy models from Canada and other jurisdictions. Toronto: United Way Toronto Publ.

Lerner, R.M. (2017). Liberty: thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233581

Roth, J.L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_6

Svallfors, S. (Ed.). (2012). Contested welfare states: welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Akhremenko, A.S. (2012). Estimation of the state’s effectiveness in the production of public services: a theoretical model and the methods of measuring. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 113-135. (In Russ.) https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4519

Annikova, L.V., Bakhutashvili, T.V., Ilchenko, E.V., & Kosinceva, Yu.F. (2019). Social-group identification and identity of modern Russian youth. Kazan Social and Humanitarian Bulletin, 4, 4-9. (In Russ.)

Arendt, H. (1992). Traditions and the modern era. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 7. Philosophy, 1, 80-85. (In Russ.)

Aseev, S.Yu., & Shashkova, Yu.Ya. (2020). The image of politics in the minds of schoolchildren in the regions of Russia and Kazakhstan: a comparative analysis. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 53, 92-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/453/11

Diligenskii, G.G. (1994). Sotsial’no-politicheskaya psikhologiya [Socio-political psychology]. Moscow: Institut “Otkrytoe obshchestvo”. (In Russ.)

Diligenskii, G.G. (2002). Lyudi srednego klassa [People of the middle class]. Moscow: Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”. (In Russ.)

Evgenyeva, T.V., Smulkina, N.V., & Tsymbal, I.A. (2020). Russia’s place in the world in the perception of national citizens: identification dimension. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 181-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.13

Grachev, E.N. (2019). Molodezhnaya politika v Evropeiskom Soyuze: natsional’nyi i nadnatsional’nyi urovni [Youth policy in the European Union: national and supranational levels]. Dissertation of the Candidate of Political Sciences. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov, M.K., & Petukhov, V.V. (Ed.) (2018). Dvadtsat’ pyat’ let sotsial’nykh transformatsii v otsenkakh i suzhdeniyakh rossiyan: opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza [Twenty-five years of Russian transformations: experience of sociological analysis]. Moscow: Ves Mir Publ. (In Russ.)

Husserl, E. (2005). Die Krisis der europaischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phanomenologische Philosophie. (Russ. ed.: Husserl, E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya. In Izbrannye raboty (pp. 443-459). Moscow: Territoriya budushchego).

Il’inskii, I.M. (2001). Molodezh’ i molodezhnaya politika: filosofiya. Istoriya. Teoriya [Youth and youth policy: philosophy. History. Theory]. Moscow: Golos. (In Russ.)

Ivanova, S.U. (2015). Civic identity and political values of youth of Russia. Humanities and Law Research, 2, 112-115. (In Russ.)

Janda, K., Berry, J.M., Goldman, J., & Hula, K.W. (2006). The challenge of democracy: American government in global politics. (Russ. ed.: Janda, K., Berry, J.M., Goldman & Hula, K.W. Trudnym putem demokratii: protsess gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v SShA. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Lapkin, V.V.,& Semenenko, I.S. (2013). “Homo politicus” vs challenges of “infomodernity”. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 64-81. (In Russ.) https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4780

Levada, Yu.A. (2006). Ishchem cheloveka: sotsiologicheskie ocherki 2000-2005 [Looking for a man: sociological essays 2000-2005]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)

Litvinova, T.N. (2020). The effectiveness of regional power: from theory to measurement (case study of the North Caucasus federal district republics). Polis. Political Studies, 2, 137-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.10

Niks, N.N. (Ed.) (2018). Rossiiskoe obshchestvo posle prezidentskikh vyborov 2018 goda: zapros na peremeny. Analiticheskii doklad [Russian society after the 2018 presidential election: a request for change. Analytical report]. Moscow: Institute of sociology RAS. (In Russ.)

O chem mechtayut rossiyane (razmyshleniya sotsiologov) [What Russians dream about (reflections of sociologists)]. (2012). Analytical report. Moscow: Institute of sociology RAS. (In Russ.)

Podyachev, K.V., & Khaliy, I.A. (2020). The state youth policy in contemporary Russia: concept and realities. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(2), 263-276. (In Russ.)

Popova, O.V. (2017). Political consciousness of today’s Russian young people. Political Science (RU), 11, 138-162. (In Russ.)

Rossiiskaya identichnost’ v sotsiologicheskom izmerenii. Analiticheskii doklad [Russian identity in sociological dimension]. (2007). Moscow: Institute of sociology RAS. (In Russ.)

Rutkauskaite, M.V. (2011). Formation of the political identity of youth through directed political socialization. Bulletin of Perm University. Series: Political Science, 3, 19-28. (In Russ.)

Sadovaya, E.S., & Sautkina, V.A. (2012). Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya mira: izmerenie, tendentsii, instituty [Quality of life of the world population: measurement, trends and institutions]. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russ.)

Sadovaya, E.S., Tsapenko, I.P., & Grishin I.V. (Ed.) (2020). The welfare state in the mirror of social transformations. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0584-0

Samarkina, I.V. (2017). Sub”ektivnoe prostranstvo politiki [The Subjective Space of Politics]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: individual, society, and politics] (pp. 380-385). Moscow: Ves Mir Publ. (In Russ.)

Schutz, A. (1994). Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences. (Russ. ed.: Schutz, A. Formirovanie ponyatiya i teorii v obshchestvennykh naukakh. In Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl’: Teksty (pp. 526-541). [American sociological thought]. Moscow: MSU. (In Russ.)

Selezneva, A.V. (2020). Political values of the Russian youth: socio-cultural features and identification potential. Society. Communication. Education, 11(3), 20-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.11302

Selezneva, A.V., & Antonov, D.E. (2020). The value bases of the civic consciousness of the Russian Youth. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 58, 227-241. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/58/21

Selezneva, A.V., & Azarnova, A.A. (2020). “Birth of a citizen”: political and psychological analysis of russian high school students’ civic consciousness. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 101-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.08

Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.) (2011). Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti. V dvukh tomakh. T.1: Identichnost’ kak kategoriya politicheskoi nauki: slovar’ terminov i ponyatii [Political identity and identity politics. In two volumes. Vol. 1: Identity as a category of political science: dictionary of terms and concepts]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.) (2012). Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti. V dvukh tomakh. T.2: Identichnost’ i sotsial’no-politicheskie izmeneniya v XXI veke [Political identity and identity politics. In two volumes. Vol. 2: Identity and socio-political changes in The XXI century]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Semenenko, I.S. (2012). “Homo politicus” facing alternative political developments: rethinking the individual dimension of politics. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 9-26. (In Russ.) https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4637

Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.) (2017). Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: personality, society, politics]. Moscow: Ves Mir Publ. (In Russ.)

Shamovskaya, T.V., & Gorbunova, G.P. (2016). Civil identity in the structure of social identity of modern young people. Materials of The Interregional Youth Scientific and Educational Forum, 4, 49-53. (In Russ.)

Shashkova, Yu.Ya., & Aseeva, T.A. (2019). Attitudes of the youth of regions of the Russian Federation to implementation of their political rights and freedoms. Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences, 14(6), 59-74. (In Russ.)

Shestopal, E.B. (Ed.) (2012). Psikhologiya politicheskogo vospriyatiya v sovremennoi Rossii [Psychology of political perception in modern Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Shestopal, E.B. (Ed.) (2015). Putin 3.0: obshchestvo i vlast’ v noveishei istorii Rossii [Putin 3.0: society and power in the modern history of Russia]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. (In Russ.)

Shestopal, E.B., & Selezneva, A.V. (Ed.) (2015). Sovremennaya elita Rossii: politiko-psikhologicheskii analiz [The modern elite of Russia: a political and psychological analysis]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. (In Russ.)

Tenyaeva, O.V. (2018). Civic identity as the basis for the formation of social activity of Russian youth. Scientific Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology, 4(2S), 248-253. (In Russ.)

Turovsky, R.F. (2013). Social and political efficiency of regional power: measurement problem. Politeia, 1, 175-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2013-68-1-175-196

Vaskov, M.A., Gaydenko, S.P., Kovalenko, S.N., & Lopatin, N.N. (2018). Civic identity and civic unity as a factor of social and political administration in a Russian city. Science and Education; Economy and Economy; Entrepreneurship; Law and Management, 4, 67-69. (In Russ.)

Zubok, Ju.A. (2020). Youth: Life Strategies in a New Reality. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 3, 4-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1688 

See also: