.jpg)
printFederal administrative elite of Russia:
features of a career after leaving office
Tev D.B.,
The Sociological Institute of the RAS – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia, denis_tev@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 180843 | ORCID: 0000-0001-5442-7585 | RESEARCHER_ID: N-5461-2017
Article received: 2021.11.08. Accepted: 2022.04.04
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.01.10
EDN: BBGNON
Rubric: Russia today
For citation:
Tev D.B. Federal administrative elite of Russia: features of a career after leaving office. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 1. P. 130-146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.01.10. EDN: BBGNON
Abstract
The article analyzes the career prospects of those having left the position of members of the federal administrative elite of Russia in 2013. The empirical study draws on a biographical database that includes 575 questionnaires updated in 2020. The theoretical framework of the study is B. Harasymiw’s model of elite recruitment. The study made it possible to identify the role that three areas of employment (corresponding to the main factions of the power elite) play in the post-career of the federal administrators. If administrative bodies (primarily at the federal level) and, to a lesser extent, business are the main recruiters of officials who have left their post, the role of representative bodies is insignificant. The “pulling” (connections, opportunity structure) and “pushing” (motivation, etc.) factors of the post-career of high-ranking officials are analyzed. According to the author, the career patterns of federal officials after leaving office allow for a better understanding of the features of the political and economic system in Russia. In particular, their demand in business emphasizes the “crony” nature of Russian capitalism, and the transition to the highest posts in parliament and the offices of governors may indicate that the federal administration is under the control of the legislature and regional authorities. It also seems that the migration of key figures in the federal administration to elite positions in other government institutions (parliament, business, etc.) contributes to inter-factional integration of the power elite. In addition, the post-career of federal officials may be related to their behavior while in office. In particular, the prospect of going into business after retirement may motivate them to adopt policies that are in the interests of potential employers, leading to “conflicts of interest”. Finally, the study made it possible to assess the stability of the elite membership: although in general, the trend of renewal (circulation) of the elite prevails, the trend of its personal reproduction is quite pronounced.
Keywords
federal administrative elite, career after leaving office, administration, business, parliament.
References
Bennett, A.J. (1996). The American president’s cabinet: from Kennedy to Bush. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blondel, J. (1991). The Post-ministerial careers. In J. Blondel, & J.-L.Thiebault (Ed.), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe (pp. 153-173). Palgrave Macmillan.
Borchert, J. (2011). Individual ambition and institutional opportunity: a conceptual approach to political careers in multi-level systems. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2011.529757
Calder, K. (1989). Elites in an equalizing role: ex-bureaucrats as coordinators and intermediaries in the Japanese government-business relationship. Comparative Politics, 21(4), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.2307/422004
Claveria, S., & Verge, T. (2015). Post-ministerial occupation in advanced industrial democracies: ambition, individual resources and institutional opportunity structures. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 819-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12107
Costa Pinto, A., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2017). The primacy of experts? Non-partisan ministers in Portuguese democracy. In A. Costa Pinto, M. Cotta, & P. Tavares de Almeida (Ed.), Technocratic Ministers andPolitical Leadership in European Democracies (pp. 111-137). London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62313-9_5
Dorrenbacher, N. (2016). Patterns of post-cabinet careers: when one door closes another door opens? Acta Politica, 51(4), 472-491. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2016.10
Eckert, R.D. (1981). The life cycle of regulatory commissioners. The Journal of Law & Economics, 24(1), 113-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466976
Etzion, D., & Davis, G.F. (2008). Revolving doors? A network analysis of corporate officers and U.S. government officials. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(3), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608316918
Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: a cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x
Fish, M.S., & Kroenig, M. (2009). The handbook of national legislatures: a global survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freitag, P.J. (1975). The cabinet and big business: a study of interlocks. Social Problems, 23(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/799652
Gill, T.M. (2018). The persistence of the power elite: presidential cabinets and corporate interlocks, 1968-2018. Social Currents, 5(6), 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496518797857.
Grigoriev, I., & Zhirkov, K. (2020). Do political connections make businesspeople richer? Evidence from Russia, 2003-2010. Research and Politics, 7(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020979434
Harasymiw, B. (1981). Mosca and Moscow: elite recruitment in the Soviet Union. In M.M. Czudnowski (Ed.), Does Who Governs Matter? Elite Circulation in Contemporary Societies (pp. 265-292). Chicago: North Illinois University Press.
Harris, J.S., & Garcia, T.V. (1966). The Permanent Secretaries: Britain’s Top Administrators. Public Administration Review, 26(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/973928
Huskey, E. (2010). Pantouflage a la Russe: the recruitment of Russian political and business elites. In S. Fortescue (Ed.), Russian Politics from Lenin to Putin (pp. 185-204). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kerbo, H.R., & McKinstry, J.A. (1995). Who rules Japan? The inner circles of economic and political power. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kryshtanovskaya, O., & White, S. (2005). Losing power in Russia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(2), 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270500108725
Nicholls, K. (1991). The dynamics of national executive service: ambition theory and the careers of presidential cabinet members. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(1), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299104400109
Rasmussen, A., Buhmann-Holmes, N., & Egerod, B. (2021). The executive revolving door: new dataset on the career moves of former Danish ministers and permanent secretaries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 44(4), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12214
Rouban, L. (1999). The senior civil service in France. In E.C. Page, & V. Wright (Ed.), Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Semenova, E. (2011). Ministerial and parliamentary elites in an executive-dominated system: post-Soviet Russia 1991-2009. Comparative Sociology, 10(6), 908-927. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913311X607629
Stolz, K., & Kintz, M. (2014). Post-cabinet careers in Britain and the US: theory, concepts and empirical illustrations. Paper prepared for the ECPR General Conference 2014, Glasgow, September 3-6, 2014.
Flyagin, А.М. (2020). How the portrait of the Russian governors has changed: analyzing biographies of the heads of Russian regions. 1991-2019. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(1), 29-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-1-29-39
Gimpel’son, V.E., & Magun, V.S. (2004). Na sluzhbe Gosudarstva Rossijskogo: perspektivy i ogranichenija kar’ery molodyh chinovnikov [In the service of the Russian State: prospects and limitations of the career of young officials]. Preprint WP3/2004/07. Moscow: HSE. (In Russ.)
Gladysheva, A.A., & Kishilova, Yu.O. (2018). The influence of political connections and government ownership on firm performance: evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 12(1), 20-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.12.1.2018.20-43
Tev, D.B. (2016). Federal administrative elite of Russia: Career Paths and Channels of Recruitment. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 115-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.04.10
Tev, D.B. (2019). Members of the Russian government: features of post-government careers. Universe of Russia, 28(4), 6-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-4-6-29
Tev, D.B. (2020). Senior officials of the Presidential Administration of Russia: recruitment channels and career. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 23(3), 153-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.7
Voronkova, O.A., Sidorova, A.A., & Kryshtanovskaja, O.V. (2011). Russian establishment: ways and methods of renewal. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 66-79. (In Russ.) https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4375
Content No. 1, 2023
See also:
Tev D.B.,
Federal Administrative Elite of Russia: Career Paths and Channels of Recruitment. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4
Etzrodt Ch.,
Managing liberal democracy – influence of secret elite networks in U.S. governments 1901-2021. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No6
Polyakov L.V.,
Theory of nation-building by Svyatoslav Kaspe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No2
Pavlichuk Ye.I.,
Federal Reporm of Belgium. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No5
Chirikova A.Ye., Ledyaev V.G., Seltser D.G.,
Power in a Small Russian Town: Configuration and Interaction of Major Local Actors. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)