print

Civilizations in modern politics:
subjectness, internal divides, dynamics

Pantin V.I.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, v.pantin@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 74145 | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-4579 |

Article received: 2022.11.08. Accepted: 2023.01.12


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.02.13
EDN: TJQJTG

Rubric: Reflecting on matters in print

For citation:

Pantin V.I. Civilizations in modern politics: subjectness, internal divides, dynamics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 2. P. 180-191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.13. EDN: TJQJTG

Abstract

The problems of the political subjectness of local civilizations and their role in world politics have gained renewed relevance due to the processes of globalization, the transformation of the world order and the formation of international regional alliances. The article analyzes the monograph “Civilizations in the modern world” (Moscow: LENAND, 2022), written by the prominent Russian political scientist and historian V.G. Khoros. The author of the monograph explores the main characteristics of modern civilizations, immersing into the key factors of political development, such as the features of internal social differentiation of each civilization and related internal political confrontations, as well as the distinctive features of non-linear dynamics and modernization processes. The monograph combines different political science approaches and provides extensive historical material. From the political science perspective, the study of non-Western civilizations – Chinese, Indian, African, Islamic, as well as Russian civilization appears to be most remarkable. All in all, the monograph provides a valuable contribution to the study of civilizations and their role in modern politics. It also provides answers to many topical issues discussed by domestic and foreign scholars.

Keywords

civilizations, political dynamics, social cleavages, modernization, Europe, USA, Russia, China, India, Islamic world, Africa, Latin America.

 Full Text

Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Coker, C. (2019). The rise of the civilizational state. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Duncombe, C., Dunne, T. (2018). After liberal order. International Affairs, 1, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix234

Huntington, S.P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ikenberry, G.J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: the origins, crisis, and transformation of American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838196

Reich, S., Lebow, R.N. (2014). Good-bye hegemony! Power and influence in the global system. Princeton; New York, NY: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691160429.001.0001

Weiwei, Z. (2012). The China wave: rise of civilizational state. Hackensack, NJ: World Century Publishing Corporation.

Zakaria, F. 2008. The post-American world. New York; London: W.W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.00993.x

Akimov, A.V., & Yakovlev, A.I. (2012). Tsivilizatsii v XXI veke: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Civilizations in the 21st century: problems and perspectives for development]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russ.).

Danilevskyi, N.Ya. (1995). Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Saint Petersburg: Glagol’. (In Russ.).

Khoros, V.G. (2022a). Tsivilizatsii v sovremennom mire. Kniga 1. Indiyskaya, Afrikanskaya, Islamskaya i Kitaiskaya tsivilizatsii. Latinoamerikanskaya tsivilizatsionnaya obshchnost’ [Civilizations in the modern world. Book 1. Indian, African, Islamic and Chinese civilizations. Latin American community]. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)

Khoros, V.G. (2022b). Tsivilizatsii v sovremennom mire. Kniga 2. Evropeiskaya tsivilizatsiya. Rossiiskaya tsivilizatsiya [Civilizations in the modern world. Book 2. European civilization. Russian civilization]. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.).

Kroeber, A. (2004). Theory of culture. (Russ. ed.: Kroeber, A. Izbrannoe: Priroda kultury. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Kulpin, E.S. (1990). Chelovek i priroda v Kitae [Human being and nature in China]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).

Kulpin, E.S. (1995). Put’ Rossii [The Russian way]. Moscow: Moskovskyi litsei. (In Russ.)

Lapkin, V.V. (2022). Socio-political dynamics in the age of the global crisis: civilizational background. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 135-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.10

Naumkin, V.V. (2020). Non-West model: does the civilization-state exist? Polis. Political Studies, 4, 78-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.06

Pantin, V.I., & Lapkin, V.V. (2014). Istoricheskoe prognozirovanie v XXI veke: Tsykly Kondrat’ieva, evolutsionnye tsykly i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya [Historical forecasting in the 21st century: Kondratieff’s cycles, evolutionary cycles and prospects for world development]. Dubna: Phoenix-plus. (In Russ.)

Spengler, O. (2003). The decline of Europe. Essays on the world history morphology. (Russ. ed.: Spengler, O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morphologii mirovoi istorii. Vol. 1. Moscow: Airis-press).

Toynbee, A.J. (1996). Civilization on trial. (Russ. ed.: Toynbee, A.J. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. Moscow: Progress – Kultura). 

See also: