Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory


Gaman-Golutvina O.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, Head of the Comparative Political Science Department, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, MFA of Russia; President, Russian Russian Political Science Association; Chairman of the Federal Educational and Methodical Association “Political and Regional Studies”; Chairman of the Expert Council, Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Member of RF Civic Chamber, ogaman@mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 250180 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2660-481X |

Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory . – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No. 3



Abstract
Elitology is an enormously popular, if relatively new domain of political science in Russia. One of the leading Russian specialists active in this sphere of research has, in the present article, set herself the task to examine and analyze the apparatus terminologicus of this discipline. There’s just one thing specialists nowadays agree about: they presume it is a contingent of persons singled out as minions of fortune that should be called elite. But elitologists differ in opinion as to what should be considered criterion of this status of being marked off by fortune as elite: nobleness of origin, wealth, or natural endowments. A challenging problem thus facing elitology consists, in paricular, in the need to investigate the ways and channels through which a certain position in achieved within a social group, or (to put it more specifically) to clear up the mechanisms of persons’ being selected for the elite, of the so-called elite recruitment. The author points to dissimilarity of elite recruitment in different countries, including different countries within the Western world.

Content No. 3, 2000

See also:


Gutorov V.A.,
Philosophy of Politics at the Turn of the Millennium: the Fate of Classical Tradition. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No1

Zamyatin D.N.,
Expanse as Image and Transaction: to the Formation of Geonomics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Taagepera A., Shugart M.S.,
Description of Electoral Systems. – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No3

Sogrin V.V.,
The Two-Party System in the USA: Continuity and Renovation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Shcherbinin A.I.,
What, After All, Will Become of Our Motherland and of Ourselves? (Biased Remarks on Russian Political Science and on Problems of Political Education) 169. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2014


Neklessa A.I.
Getting over Eurasia (geo-economic essay)

  Полный текст
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991