Geopolitical Analysis of the International Problems of Modernity:
Pro et Contra
Rubric: ORBIS TERRARUM
For citation:
Solovyov E.G. Geopolitical Analysis of the International Problems of Modernity: Pro et Contra . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 6
Abstract
The author makes an attempt to verify judgments, rather widely spread in modern Russia, as to unconditional significance, both in theory and as being practically applied, of geopolitical ideas and methods. The causes of geopolitics’ especial attractiveness for politicians and theoreticians of right-radical and left orientations are analyzed. The qualitative changes that took place in Western geopolitics after the cold war ended, are then described. Problematics of bipolarity, unipolarity, multipolarity and of a uni-multipolar system are discussed in detail. Finally, processes of expansion of the research field of geopolitics, first of all owing to geoeconomics, are characterized. Absolutely state-centered character of geopolitical analysis is qualified as its most vulnerable point. As for the most promising spheres of geopolitical theorizing, E.G.Solovyov numbers among them analytical study of regional expanses.
Content No. 6, 2001
See also:
Arbatov A.G.,
It Did Not Work and Will Not Work? On the Reasons of the Failure of Anti-Missile Cooperation Between Russia and the United States. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2
Neklessa A.I.,
The Crises of History. The World as an Unfinished Project. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No1
Gaman-Golutvina O.V., Solov’eva D.D.,
France’s New Political Elite Against the Old Recruitment System. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No6
Malkov S.Yu., Korotayev A.V., Isayev L.M., Kuzminova Ye.V.,
On methods of estimating current condition and of forecasting social instability: attempted quantitative analysis of the events of the Arab spring. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4
Zamyatin D.N.,
Geopolitics: Major Problems and Results of Development in the 20th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6