What There Lies behind the “Uncivicness”

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.05.04
For citation:

Goncharov D.V. What There Lies behind the “Uncivicness” . – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No. 5. P. 34-42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2002.05.04


The author’s thought is preoccupied by the issue of methods of studying the substantial diversity of Russian regions’ political culture, i.e. of studying its diversity inasmuch as the latter receives objectively discernible subjective expression which is exactly to be discerned, demonstrated and explained. The claimed purpose of the research is, in particular, to correctly pose the question of what patterns of uncivicness may be found in Russian subnational political culture, or, to be more concrete, what the Russian regional elites’ understanding of interaction between civil society and government at the local levels is like. The subjective structures of uncivicness, that are inherent in regional political culture, are investigated in the article through considering the orientations of elite groups. In order to reveal the diversity of social objects’ thinking, an original intensive research technique was employed — Q-methodology (one of the variants of content-analysis), which so far has been but seldom employed by Russian political scientists. The accomplished research is a case study: it is concentrated on studying the elite groups of one of the Russian regions, namely Orenburg oblast’.

(электронная версия)

Content No. 5, 2002

See also:

Sorokin K.E.,
Russia and the Play of Geopolitical Interests in the Great Ocean Area. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No4

Barsukova S.Yu.,
Problems of Refugees and Emergency Migrants in the Mirror of Ideologies. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No5

Pastukhov V.B.,
From Statehood to the State: Europe and Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2

Laslo E. ,
Birth of a World - Birth of a Science - Birth of an Age. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Pshizova S.N.,
Democracy and Political Market in a Comparative Perspective (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No3



   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991