Prerequisites for the Rise and Consolidation of Polyarchies




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.06.05
Rubric: THESAURUS

For citation:

Dahl R. Prerequisites for the Rise and Consolidation of Polyarchies . – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No. 6. P. 34-57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2002.06.05



Abstract

This publication is the Russian translation of Chapter 18 from a book, much-talked-of, by a well- known American political scientist, R. Dahl (Dahl R.A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, 1989). Having set himself the question of why stable polyarchy has developed in some countries, and not others, the scholar sets off some conditions which, if available, make polyarchy almost a sure thing. Thoroughly analyzing the experience of many countries, he, on the basis of this analysis, comes to the conclusion that a country is very likely to develop and sustain the institutions of polyarchy (a) if the means of violent coercion are dispersed or neutralized; (b) if it possesses a modern dynamic pluralist society; (c) if it is culturally homogeneous, or, if it is heterogeneous, is not segmented into strong and distinctive subcultures, or, if it is so segmented, its leaders have succeeded in creating a consociational arrangement for managing subcultural conflicts; (d) if it possesses a political culture and beliefs, particularly among political activists, that support the institutions of polyarchy; (e) if it is not subject to intervention by a foreign power hostile to polyarchy. By the same token, if a country lacks these conditions, or if the obverse conditions are strongly presented, a country will almost certainly be governed by a nondemocratic regime. In countries with mixed conditions, according to Dahl's conclusion, if polyarchy exists at all, it is likely to be unstable; in some countries, regimes may oscillate between polyarchy and a nondemocratic regime.

 
(электронная версия)

Content No. 6, 2002

See also:


Sartori G.,
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Griffin R.,
Fascism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

Poupar P. Cardinal.,
The Role of Christianity in European Peoples' Cultural Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No2

Lijphart A.,
Consociational Designing. – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No4

Sartori G.,
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991