Rethinking Modernity

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.02.03
For citation:

Discussion. Rethinking Modernity . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 2. P. 12-33. (In Russ.).


The idea to "rethink" Modernity, or, rather, the prevalent ideas of it, came from the members of the Polis' International Consultative Committee and of its Editorial Board - B.Wittrock, A.Yu.Melvil, H.Alker, A.S.Kuzmin and V.M.Sergeyev. Guided by the consideration that the very nature of Modernity as "unfinished project" presupposes definition of the Modern as definition being continually completed, and its qualitative characterization as one being made ever more precise, they proposed a discussion to be held that could concentrate on issues requiring new, non-standard answers. This proposal met with the support of a number of the country's well-known scholar institutions, such as the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (U), the Moscow State University, the Russian International Studies Association and the Institute of Humane and Political Studies. As a result, an international "Rethinking Modernity" scientific conference was held in Moscow in late October 2002, in which notable Russian and foreign specialists in the issues of the Modern took part. The conference was designed and put through as an organic succession of four round tables: "Turning Points of History and the World Order"; "Prospects of Evolution of the State in the Modern World"; "New Threats to the International Security"; "New Economic Structures and the World Politics". In the present issue we acquaint the reader with an abridged version of the proceedings of the former two.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 2, 2003

See also:

Pshizova S.N.,
Financing Political Market: Theoretical Aspects of Practical Problems (1). – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No1

Mezhuyev B.V.,
Post-Colonial Transition and “Transnationalization” of Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Podvintzev O.B.,
Complications of Post-Imperial Adaptation of Conservative Consciousness: Statement of the Problem and an Essay of Classification.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No3

Solovyov A.I.,
Political Ideology: the Logic of Historical Evolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No2

Vishnevsky A.G.,
United and Indivisible. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2



   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991