Bearer of Legitimacy (Russian Political Tradition of Organization of the Power’s Social Address)

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.05.07
Rubric: Version

For citation:

Vorobyov D.M. Bearer of Legitimacy (Russian Political Tradition of Organization of the Power’s Social Address) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 5. P. 56-64. (In Russ.).


The author deems it a pressing necessity that a new model of social stratification be elaborated, apt to reflect specific features of sociums which have been developing under economic, ideological and political conditions other than those in the West. He formulates his own hypothesis supposed to explain specificity of the Russian system of the power social support organization. According to this hypothesis, the power in Russia has for its base a certain part of the population, which has no clear-cut delimitation. It is this part of the population — a kind of social vector through which political governance, as process, is invariably exercised — that performs the function of “legitimacy bearer”: it is on its numeric strength and social ramification that acceptance of, and compliance with the power-wielding agent’s will depend. In other words, the “legitimacy bearer” in Russia does not coincide with any horizontal stratum, for, on the one hand, no social stratum is wholly comprised in it, yet, on the other, it includes representatives of all social strata and groups existing at a given moment. To substantiate the suggested hypothesis, the author turns to a panoramic review of Russian history for the past 400 years and examines three historical types of the “legitimacy bearer”, which he conditionally designates as “the Orthodox believers”, “the army”, and “the proletariat”.

Content No. 5, 2003

See also:

Lukin A.V.,
The Transition Period in Russia: Democratization and Liberal Reforms. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No2

Oleskin A.V.,
Network Structures of Society from the Viewpoint of Biopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1

Sokolskaya I.B.,
Is the Conservative Revolution Conservative? (On a Chronological Scale of Political Theories). – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No6

Kulpin E.S.,
How to Transform Ourselves?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No4

Blyakher L.Ye.,
Want of Nationalism, or National Self-Consciousness in Russia’s Far East. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3



   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991