So What Does the Russians’ Choice Consist In?


Pantin I.K.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), chief researcher, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russia, i.pantin@mail.ru


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.06.14
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Pantin I.K. So What Does the Russians’ Choice Consist In? – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No 6. P. 155-162 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.06.14



Abstract

The article has been written as a further contribution to the discussion of the problem of Russia’s historic choice, developed in the journal (see Polis, 2003, No. 1-2, 4-5). In 1991 to 1993, I.K.Pantin holds, Russia embarked upon the road of democratic development, but the type of political regime that formed in the country is mostly in compliance with the model of democracy, which was described by J. Schumpeter and of which the whole point boils down to regularly holding alternative elections. So, democracy as form of citizens’ being concerned in the exercise of political power, has taken root in Russia, but thus far only in its “Schumpeterian” form, which does not solve the main problems of the country. Such democracy has become part and parcel of traditional Russian mode of rule, whose basic feature is unconditional priority of the interests of the states over those of the individual and society. In order that the democratic choice become actually irreversible, the author affirms, society’s self-change is required, formation of other political culture. There is need for such form of democratic interaction, for such mechanism of the development of ethnic, cultural, and economic diversity, that would enable all population groups’ self-realization, actualization of their creative potential within new societal synthesis.


Content No 6, 2003

See also:


Rogozhina K.A.,
Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Yanov A.L.,
Slavophiles and Foreign Politics of Russia in the 19th Century.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Melville A.Yu.,
So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Yavlinsky G.A.,
The Loss of the Future. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2017


Myasnikov A.G.
The Right to Lie as a Trap for Freedom

 The article text
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991