Vision and Adoption of Western Institutions and Values within Post-Soviet Dimensions:
Experience of the Ukraine and Russia


Lapkin V.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Leading Researcher, Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, First Deputy Editor‑in‑Chief, Polis. Political Studies. Moscow, Russia, vvlh@politstudies.ru

elibrary_id: 43429 |

Pantin V.I.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Head of Department, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences; Principal Researcher, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, v.pantin@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 74145 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.01.05

For citation:

Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. Vision and Adoption of Western Institutions and Values within Post-Soviet Dimensions: Experience of the Ukraine and Russia . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No 1. P. 74-88 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.01.05



Abstract

Analysis to be found in the article is based on data of mass polls carried out in the period of 1992 to 2003 by leading Russian and Ukrainian organizations studying public opinion; and the subject of the analysis is transformations that have been being undergone within, respectively, Ukrainian and Russian societies by habitual ideas of the key objects of the respective countries' socio-political and national-state development, as well as by, respectively, Ukrainian and Russian societies' vision - and attitude as regards eventual adoption - of Western institutions and values. The authors are considering, in the comparative-historical aspect, the problems of assimilation by mass consciousness in both these post-Soviet countries, of such Western political institutions and values, as multiparty system, the presidency institution, parliamentarism, the institution of free elections, the values of democracy, market economy, freedom, human rights, tolerance to one's neighbors; they disclose the main factors which determine the features of similarity and of distinction in the functioning of Western political institutions in the Ukraine and in Russia. Special attention is given to discussing the alternatives and the recently outlined distinctions in the socio-political development of the Ukraine and of Russia, with due regard to cultural traditions proper to each of them, to the respective socio-psychological archetypes, to the inertia of political experience; the just mentioned factors' influence is demonstrated, on the prospects of these countries' modernization and national-political consolidation. 


Content No 1, 2004

See also:


Durdin D.M.,
The “Image” of a Political Leader and Possibilities of Changing It. – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No2

Glubotzky A.Yu., Kynev A.V.,
The Party Component of the Russian Regions’ Legislative Assemblies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No6

Nechayev V.D.,
Factors and Preconditions of Local Self-government’s Financial Autonomy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Tolpygo A.K.,
The Reds in the Ukraine. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No4

Nechayev V.D.,
Territorial Organization of Local Self-Government in Russia’s Regions (Comparative Analysis of the Instances of the Kursk and Belgorod Oblasts). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No2

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991