From the Monarchist Idea to the Conservative One:
F.R.Chвteaubriand and the Development of Russian Political Thought in the First Half of the 19th Century


Koval Ye.I.

Nazukina M.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Researcher at the Department for the Study of Political Institutions and Processes, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Perm State National Research University, nazukina@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 251245 | ORCID: 0000-0003-0190-0513 | RESEARCHER_ID: : L-8246-2016


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.05.08
For citation:

Koval Ye.I., Nazukina M.V. From the Monarchist Idea to the Conservative One: F.R.Chвteaubriand and the Development of Russian Political Thought in the First Half of the 19th Century . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 5. P. 92-101. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.05.08



Abstract

The gist of the article, by its immediate subject, comes to comparative analysis of ideological-political views of F.R.Chвteaubriand and of three Russian protoconservatives - N.M.Karamzin, S.S.Uvarov and A.S.Khomyakov. After adducing quite a few testimonies to all the four thinkers' having substantially advanced toward conservatism in its modern understanding, the authors yet cogently demonstrate that neither Chвteaubriand, nor the Russian thinkers holding the same views, ever proved able to go the whole length of it; so, they remained in the first place monarchists. According to the authors' conclusion, such run of things was preconditioned by the fact that the systems of views of these forerunners of conservatism were not so much the result of conscious choice, as the product of emotional reaction to the revolutionary events in France.


Content No. 5, 2005

See also:


Kiryanov I.K.,
Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Titov K.V.,
“Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Neganov S.V.,
The Perm Oblast: Political Picture of a Region and Development of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Podvintzev O.B.,
Psephology as the Science Studying Elections. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Sulimov K.A.,
To Paradoxical Character of Modern Political Knowledge. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2014


Lukin A.V.
Is other democracy possible?

  Полный текст
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991