Putin's Third Term as Alternative to Political Hypocrisy (Remark of a Political Cynic)

Pastukhov V.B.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., St. Antony’s College, Oxford, vladimir.pastukhov@gmail.com

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.02.13
Rubric: Dixi!

For citation:

Pastukhov V.B. Putin's Third Term as Alternative to Political Hypocrisy (Remark of a Political Cynic) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 2. P. 162-172. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.02.13


The motif of the article consists in substantiating the thesis that in the present situation — the power remaining the dominant organizing principle of Russian life and there being no real opposition in the country, able of offering a new agenda, — Putin cannot quit the power, he can only step aside from it, on creating a system of control over the successor's activity. On analyzing the general line-up of forces in the country, the author comes to the conclusion that in case Putin's reelection for a new term is rejected, the most probable scenario will be the return to a system of "party control" and the establishment of a party "diarchy", with the appearance in the party, apart from the leader (Putin), of an "appointee" — a person whom it delegates to "work" as president. In the author's estimation, the main consequence of such developments will be the formation of a bipolar political system and administrative chaos, which, as compared with keeping Putin for a third term, will cause greater damage to Russia. It will be simpler for Russia and will cost her less, the author holds, to leave Putin at his post for another five years, than to shake up the whole country in order to create conditions under which the latter will be able to rule the state from "political underground".

Content No. 2, 2006

See also:

Tretyakov V.T.,
The U.S. and Russia under Trump and Putin: One Against the Other, Apart, or Together?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6

Ufimtzev V.V.,
But Has There Been Any Choice? 165. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Sorokina V.S.,
Staging of Political Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No6

Rogozhina K.A.,
Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Pantin I.K.,
To the Logic of Theoretical Formation of Modern Socialism. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
1 2018

Neklessa A.I.
The Crises of History. The World as an Unfinished Project

 The article text 


   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991