An Attempt of Adapting Left Radical Ideology to Realities of the Modern World:
Experience of Zapatism




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.05.09
For citation:

Morozov I.L. An Attempt of Adapting Left Radical Ideology to Realities of the Modern World: Experience of Zapatism . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 5. P. 129-143. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.05.09



Abstract

The motif of the article is research of Zapatism as one of the most famed currents in the world movement of antiglobalists. On the basis of detailed analysis of the Zapatists’ strategy and of the views of their leader – subcomandante Marcos,– the author tries to judge the possibilities of helping left radical doctrines out of the sense crisis and historical deadlock. According to his conclusion, this attempt to adapt radical opposition of left persuasion to the tendencies of the late 20th to early 21st centuries, for all its promising beginning in the 1990s, now looks far from unquestionable. Zapatism as the newest version of left radical ideology adapted to the conditions of post-modernity is beginning to lag behind the realities of the modern world. It’s no simple task that now faces Marcos: to win back his intellectual leadership and to restore his political influence in antiglobalism. This requires a bold and non-typical move. It is just on whether Marcos finds himself able to make such a move, that further fortunes of Zapatism will depend, the author holds.

 


Content No. 5, 2006

See also:


Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991