.jpg)
printUrbanity in the political-science dimension
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.01.13
Rubric: Reflecting on matters in print
For citation:
Fadeyeva L.A. Urbanity in the political-science dimension . – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 1. P. 178-181. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.01.13
Abstract
Under review is the book by V.G. Ledyayev: Sociology of Power. Theory and Experience of Empirical Research of Power. M., High School of Economics Publishing House. 2012. Characterized in the review are the cognitive models offered in the book – models that are often applied for empirical research of power. Basing her estimations on the presentation of the models in the book, the reviewer accentuates their heuristic potential for the analysis of power in modern Russia.
Keywords
power practices; urban communities; elitists; pluralists; cognitive models; urban regimes.
Content No. 1, 2014
See also:
Tarusina I.G.,
Elitists and Pluralists in Contemporary Political Theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4
Chirikova A.Ye., Ledyaev V.G., Seltser D.G.,
Power in a Small Russian Town: Configuration and Interaction of Major Local Actors. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2
Gelman V.Ya.,
Regional Power in Today's Russia: Institutes, Regimes, Practices.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1
Turovsky R.F.,
Comparative Analysis of Russia’s and the Ukraine’s Regional Development Tendencies. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No6
Samarkina I.V., Bashmakov I.S.,
Local Identity and Mechanisms of its Conversion into Constructive Socio-Political Practices of Youth. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)