Getting over Eurasia (geo-economic essay)


Neklessa A.I.,

Chairman of the Commission on the social and cultural globalization; member of the Bureau of the Scientific Council “History of World Culture” at the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); Head of the Laboratory for Geo-economic Analysis, Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, neklessa@intelros.ru

elibrary_id: 74629 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.03.03
For citation:

Neklessa A.I. Getting over Eurasia (geo-economic essay). – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 3. P. 27-46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.03.03



Abstract

The current era is a time of global transformation of the world order: the transit of territorial (geopolitical) format of Modernity urban culture and its main political form, the national state to geo-economic state: a dynamic modus operandi trans-boundary metapolis culture (geo-economics). Actual formula of current peace-building phase is a new regionalism, which is formed on the basis of existing economic ties within the geo-economic matrix of the new division of labor and socio-cultural gravity connecting complementary peoples in complex dynamic community, based on anthropological rather than territorial reading of post-modern political geography (“country is its people”). Key resource is the socio-cultural identity and active, productive viability manifested within the geo-economic and post-economic worldview. Folding the Russian identity is closely linked to territorial expansion in the north-east direction, which embraced both colonization and geo-cultural build vast expanses and targeted promotions to the ocean coast: wiring the Northern Sea Route, the laying of the Great Siberian tract, improvement of Maritime Province (Primorye) with access to the open spaces of the Pacific (Slavorossia – “Slavic Russia”), as well as the progressive development of Turkestan and Northeast China (“Yellow Russia”) with the prospect of implementing the idea of Trans-Eurasian springboard. Primary means of expansion and improvement conceived transport arteries, mainly railway construction: Trans-Siberian, Chinese Eastern Railway, South Manchurian Railway, and other Trans-Caspian routes. Implementation of large-scale transport and infrastructure megaproject in Russian was completed at the beginning of the 20th century and was the basis for industrial, industrial takeoff.

Keywords
geo-economics; geopolitics; Russia; Eurasia; Siberia; the Far East; Yellow Russia; Slavorossiya; Russian America; Manchuria; Trans-Siberian; the Northern Sea Route.


Content No. 3, 2014

See also:


Karaganov S.A.,
Departure of Military Superiority of the West, and Geo-Economics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No6


PANORAMA OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF RUSSIA: FAR EAST. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Simonia N.A.,
New strategic factors in the struggle for Russia’s modernization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3

Inozemtzev V.L.,
Сolonies vs. dependencies: invitation to a discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4

Isayev B.A.,
Geopolitics: classical and modern. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2003


Kurochkin A.V., Kurochkina Ye.O.
Experience of Municipal Reformation in the States of Baltic Europe

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991