Russia:
historic ways and crossroads in the XX century


Sheynis V.L.,

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Principal Researcher, Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, sheynis31@gmail.com



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.04.15
For citation:

Sheynis V.L. Russia: historic ways and crossroads in the XX century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 4. P. 176-188. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.04.15



Abstract

The new book by Yu.S. Pivovarov (Pivovarov Yu.S. Russkoe nastoyashchee i sovetskoe proshloe [Russian Present and Soviet Past]. Moscow – St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives, University Book. 2014. 336 p. ISBN: 978‑5-98712‑202‑0) is in many ways distinctive from the mainstream literature on historiosophy and political science. Presented in the book is a fresh interpretation of the key processes and events of the Russian history. According to the author, the country experienced an anthropological disaster in the XX century, as several revolutionary currents collided in 1917: Europeanized part of the society renounced the traditional authority, the peasantry committed capture and redistribution of land, while the Bolshevik Revolution, taking advantage of the moment, terminated both. In the context of Russian history, the Bolshevik movement is labeled by Yu.S. Pivovarov as a variety of the “Russian Power” system, where power is fused with property – a term “vlastesobstvennost’” (“powerproperty”) is introduced in this regard – as well as a variety of a generalized model of power and society structure, going back to the times of Ivan the Terrible (“oprichnina – zemshchina”). Analyzed are the stages of formation and decomposition of this regime. According to the author, the 1980-s / 1990-s democratic revolution was unable to overcome Sovietism and Stalinism embedded in the socio-psychological condition of the society. It revitalized the cultural-historic phenomenon of the “red Black Hundreds” as a response to the process of modernization and the social reserve of the antidemocratic authority. Turning to the prospects for change of the current situation, the author concludes that either Russia will be a free and responsible country, or it will not exist at all.

Keywords
Yu.S. Pivovarov; Russia; the February Revolution; anthropological disaster; the Bolshevik Revolution; the Bolshevik regime; “powerproperty”.

 Full Text Как найти бездепозитный бонус за регистрацию в казино 2020 casinobezdepozita.com в надежных и проверенных игровых клубах.

Content No. 4, 2015

See also:


Pivovarov Yu.S.,
The Sources and the Essence of the Russian Revolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No5

Pivovarov Yu.S.,
«...And the age in a mess». – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6

Pastukhov V.B.,
Ukrainian revolution and Russian counter-revolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No5

Pantin I.K.,
«Orange» pills for russian diseases. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6

Grinin L.Ye., Korotaev A.V.,
Revolution vs. Democracy (revolution and conterrevolution in Egypt). – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2020


Gallarotti G.M.
How to Measure Soft Power in International Relations

 The article text 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991