Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II


Satarov G.A.,

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), President, INDEM Foundation, moskars@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 165292 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.02.09
For citation:

Satarov G.A. Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 2. P. 109-130. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.09



Abstract

In the second part of the article the author presents one of the implementations of his approach to analysis of public survey data, namely the statistical technique and results of its application, the necessity of which is proved in the first part of the article. The object of the statistical analysis is a network of nodes which represent the nominal values of sociological variables, and the links between nodes are statistically significant dependencies between the values of the variables, represented by the values of standardized residuals in the cells of the contingency tables. We study the local properties of such network in the nodes, which are variants of answers to similar questions about the trust in the four public institutions, given during the polls conducted on the representative nationwide samplings in 1998, 2001 and 2015. It is shown that the various characteristics that reflect of the centrality these nodes carry important information about the state of public opinion. The author demonstrates a qualitative change in the state of public opinion during the study period. It is shown that such changes are not homogeneous, but rather depend on the objects that are measured by the public opinion. The author substantiates the dependence of these changes on the state of the political system and society, and suggests a hypothesis, according to which, in some cases, the standard simple approaches to the analysis of the results of public survey data cannot provide relevant results, interpretable in a simple and familiar way.

 

 

Keywords
trust; political sociology; public opinion; opinion survey; consistency; mathematical and statistical methods; social network analysis; data mining.


Content No. 2, 2016

See also:


Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No1

Bernays E.L.,
Manipulating public opinion: the why and the how. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No4

Chugrov S.V.,
Mikhail Gorshkov’s experience of social diagnostics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Bezvikonnaya Ye.V.,
Systemico-Synergetic Model of a Political System. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Chugrov S.V.,
Russian Politics through Prism of Sociological Measurements. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2012


Tu Weiming
Implications of the rise of «confucian» East Asia

 The article text
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991