Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science:
Classification Experience


Kuchinov A.M.,

Post‑graduate student, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, arkuchinov@yandex.ru

elibrary_id: 687022 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.05.07
For citation:

Kuchinov A.M. Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science: Classification Experience . – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. P. 80-96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.07



Abstract

The article presents the author’s observation of texts and discourse research methods. Theories, methods and techniques from various scientific disciplines for working with texts and discourses as empirical data are observed, namely traditional methods, content analysis, grounded theory, ethnography, methods based on political psychology, etnomethodology, phenomenology, semiotics, text linguistics, speech acts theory and cognitive linguistics theories, discourse analysis, symbolic politics / policy, methods of sociolinguistics, theory of communication, functional pragmatics, theory of difference, hermeneutics, objective hermeneutics, methods of psycholinguistics, psychosemantics, suggestive linguistics and phonosemantics. A number of types of content analysis, including protocols for the study of leadership from political psychology are discussed in the article. Due to the fact that the subjects of various disciplines within linguistics and related sciences, as well as various methods intercross often, this classification is only one from many possible. The author emphasizes that the Russian political science lacks application of methods observed in the article, even in the cases where they can and should be used, on the contrary to other sciences.

Keywords
content analysis; discourse; hermeneutics; metaphors; methods; psycholinguistics; sociolinguistics; texts.


Content No. 5, 2016

See also:


Mishanova Ye.V.,
Problem of operationalization of the ideological field in content-analytical studies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Kubyshkina Ye.V.,
US political discourse under the presidency of G. Bush Jr.: evolution of metaphors. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1

Nezhdanov D.V., Rusakova O.F.,
«Political market» as system-forming metaphor of modern political-science discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4

Pecherskaya N.V.,
To Know or to Call: Metaphor as Cognitive Resource of Social Knowledge. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No2

Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2003


Sulimov K.A.
Michael Oakshot as Critic of Rationalism

 The article text
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991