What Will Save the Modern State (About the Book by N. Noonan and V. Nadkarni)
Lecturer, Department for International Relations and Foreign Policy of Russia; postgraduate student, Department for Oriental Studies, MGIMO-University, firstname.lastname@example.org_id: 775712 |
Today traditional inter-state security concerns coexist with new security preoccupations. The reviewed book (Challenge and Change. Global Threats and the State in Twenty-first Century International Politics. Ed. by Norma C. Noonan, Vidya Nadkarni) addresses the question whether the twenty-firstcentury state would be able to address the challenges posed by rapid world change. The founding premise of the book is that while the challenges we face transcend political borders, the answers can only be generated within the context of the prevailing inter-state system and international organizations. In this new political universe, concepts such as polarity, power, alliances, and deterrence that dominated the analysis of international relations during the Cold War, enable us to capture only a narrow slice of a twenty-firstcentury world buffeted by transnational forces that defy simple inter-state logics. This book grapples with the tension between the continued relevance of the state and the increasing inability of the state to deal unilaterally with traditional and non-traditional challenges. Standard foreign policy instruments of states can no longer be deployed successfully to resolve the range of global challenges that confront us. Some form of global governance to tackle transnational problems is the sine qua non of world order. Whether the major powers are able and willing to lead us into this new world is the abiding question of the twenty-first century.
Bogaturov A.D. Counter-Revolution of Values and International Security. – International Trends. 2008. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 14-25. (In Russ.)
Challenge and Change. Global Threats and the State in Twenty-first Century International Politics. Ed. by Norma C. Noonan, Vidya Nadkarni. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016. 287p. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48479-6
Chugrov S. American World Order: The End of the ‘End of History’. – Japanese Journal of Political Science. 2015. No. 16 (3). P. 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109915000110
Emerging Powers in a Comparative Perspective. The Political and Economic Rise of the BRIC Countries. Ed. by Vidya Nadkarni and Norma C. Noonan. N.Y.: Bloomsbury. 2012. 256 p.
Etzioni A. The Devolution of American Power. – The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2013. Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 13-34. URL: https://www.fletcherforum.org/s/Etzioni_37-1.pdf (accessed: 09.04.2018)
Haass R.N. The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance. – Foreign Affairs. 2008. Vol. 87. No. 3. P. 44-56. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20032650 (accessed: 09.04.2018)
Khenkin S.M. Separatism against the State: the Case of Catalonia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 3. P. 166-175. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.11
Nadkarni V. Strategic Partnerships in Asia: Balancing without Alliances. London: Routledge. 2010. 272 p.
The Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing Systems, Enduring Interests. Ed. by Robert H.Donaldson, Joseph L. Nogee and Vidya Nadkarni. London: Routledge. 2014. 419 p.
Zakaria F. Post-American World. N.Y.: W.W. Norton. 2009. 292 p.
Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics: 5 years on track. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5
Russia’s national security. durability trial. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1
Nuclear reloading and international security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3
Liberal approach to russian foreign policy. Notes on the margins of the book by V. Petrovsky. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No2
National and international security: political and military aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1