Staging of Political Reality


Sorokina V.S.,

postgraduate student, Department of International Journalism, MGIMO University, vero-nika-vika@mail.ru



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.06.11
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Sorokina V.S. Staging of Political Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 6. P. 145-158. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.11



Abstract

The term ‘staging’, which appeared in the 1920s and 1930s as part of the theatrical vocabulary, acquired a new meaning with the advent of new media. Today, this concept reflects the invasion of dramaturgical principles, both in the everyday life of each person, and in global political processes. Using methodologies developed by the classics of political sociology and communication science (Baudrillard, Habermas, McLuhan) and modern researchers (Fischer-Lichte, Meyer, Schicha), the author shows how, as a result of the staging, the border between the real and the imagined is blurred. This can later be used for manipulating public opinion. The article discusses historical examples of the ‘dramatization of reality’ and its features at the present stage, and also analyzes the processes that create conditions for the popularization and widespread use of dramatization as well as its covered mechanisms. The author concludes that, amidst the growth of irrationality and uncertainty in society and the increasing role of the masses in shaping the information agenda, it is they, and not individual actors and ruling elites, who become the main ‘customer’ of the staged reality. At the same time, it becomes more and more difficult to neutralize the negative effects of the staging, since it has more than a single source and avoids control under current conditions.

Keywords
staging, symbolic politics, political reality; information space, mass media.


References

Alexander J.C. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beck U. 2010. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Burke P. 1993. Ludwig XIV. Die Inszenierung des Sonnenkonigs. Berlin: Wagenbach.

Castells M. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dorner A. 2001. Politainment. Politik in der medialen Erlebnisgesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Edelman M. 1976. Politik als Ritual. Die symbolische Funktion staatlicher Institutionen und politischen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

Entman R. 1993. Framing: Towards a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. – Journal of Communication. Vol. 43. No. 3. P. 51-58.

Fischer-Lichte E. 1998. Inszenierung und Theatralitat. – Willems H., Jurga M. (Hg.) Inszenierungsgesellschaft. Opladen: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. S. 81-90.

Fischer-Lichte E. 2000. Theatralitat und Inszenierung. – Fischer-Lichte E. (Hg.) Inszenierung von Theatralitat. Tubingen: Francke. S.11-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89797-8_3

Hoffmann J. Sarcinelli U. 1999. Politische Wirkungen der Medien. – Wilke J. (Hg.) Mediengeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Koln: Bohlau Verlag. S. 720-751.

Kaase M. 1998. Demokratisches System und die Mediatisierung von Politik. Seite 22 bis 51. – Sarcinelli U. (Hg.) Politikvermittlung und Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft. Bonn: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. S. 22-51.

Kuhn F. 2000. Inszenierung und Glaubwuerdigkeit. – Siller P., Pitz G. (Hg.) Politik als Inszenierung. Zur Asthetik des Politischen in Medienzeitalter. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag. S. 94-95.

Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger S. 2012. Die Macht der Medien ist kein Selbstzweck. – Hestermann T. (Hg.) Von Lichtgestalten und Dunkelmannern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften. S. 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18991-8_1

Meyer T. 2000a. Angemessenheitsbedingungen fur die mediale Inszenierung des Politischen. – Schicha C., Brosda C. (Hg.) Medienethik zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Munster: LIT. S. 167-172.

Meyer T. 2000b. Die Theatralitat der Politik. – Siller P., Pitz. G. (Hg.) Politik als Inszenierung. Zur Asthetik des Politischen in Medienzeitalter. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag. S. 117-122.

Meyer T. 2001. Mediokratie. Die Kolonisierung der Politik durch die Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Meyer T., Ontrup R., Schicha C. 2000. Die Inszenierung des politischen Welt-Bildes. Politikinszenierungen zwischen medialem und politischem Eigenwert. – Fischer-Lichte E., Pf lug I. (Hg.) Inzenierung von Authentizitat. Tubingen: Francke. S. 183-208.

Schicha C. 2000. Offentlichkeit unter Medienbedingungen. – Schicha C., Brosda C. (Hg.) Medienethik zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Munster: LIT. S. 173-194.

Schicha C., Brosda C. 2002. Politikvermittlung in Unterhaltungsformaten. Medieninszenierungen zwischen Popularitat und Populismus. Munster: LIT. 264 S. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-003-0128-z

Schicha C. 2003. Die Theatralitat der politischen Kommunikation, Medieninszenierungen am Beispiel des Bundestagswahlkampfes 2002. Munster: LIT.

Schicha C., Ontrup R. 1999. Medieninszenierungen im Wandel. Interdisziplinare Zugange. Munster: LIT.Aronson E., Pratkanis A.R. 2003. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. (Russ. ed.: Pratkanis A.R., Aronson E. Epoha propagandy: Mekhanizmy ubezhdeniya, povsednevnoe ispol’zovanie i zloupotreblenie. St. Petersburg: Praim-ЕVROZNAK).

Baudrillard J. 2015. Simulation et simulacres. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard J. Simulyatsiya i simulyakry. Moscow: POSTUM).

Baudrillard J. 2016. The Spirit of Terrorism. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard J. Duh terrorizma. Vojny v zalive ne bylo. Moscow: Ripol Klassik).

Baumann Z. 2005. Liquid Life. (Russ. ed.: Baumann Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’. St. Petersburg: Piter).

Berger P.L., Luckmann T. 1995. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Berger, P. L., Luckmann T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya. Moscow: Medum; Academia Centr).

Chugrov S.V. 2017. Post-truth: Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy? – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 42-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04

Kravchenko S.A., Podberezkin A.I. 2016. Social Nets as a New Factor of System Security in Russia in the 21st Century. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. Vol. 51. No. 6. P. 14-23. (In Russ.)

McLuhan M. 2001. Understanding Media. (Russ. ed.: McLuhan M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. Moscow; Zhukovskij: KANON-press-C, Kuchkovo pole).

Simvolicheskaya politika [Symbolic Politics]. 2012. Ed. By O.Yu. Malinova. Vyp. 1: Konstruirovanie.

Content No. 6, 2019

See also:


Moiseyev N.N.,
Information Society: Possibilities and Realities. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No3

Potseluyev S.P.,
Symbolical Politics: A Constellation of Concepts for an Approach to the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No5

Shevchenko A.V.,
Stability of political system: homo communicativus vs homo politicus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5

Bespalov S.V.,
Prospects of realization of Russia’s geopolitical interests on the post-soviet space. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Editorial Introduction,
Manuscripts Don’t Burn! Introduction to the Rubric “Symbolic Politics”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2012


Rivera D.W., Rivera Sh.V.
Yeltsin, Putin and the power of the president

 The article text
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991